Borel, continuous and smooth cohomology of Lie groups
From: John Baez (baez_at_galaxy.ucr.edu)
Date: 08/27/04
- Next message: Robert Israel: "Re: multiplicative vs algebraic independence"
- Previous message: Volker Runde: "Re: Derivations on l^infinity(Z)"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Fri, 27 Aug 2004 18:30:03 +0000 (UTC)
If G is a Lie group and A is an abelian Lie group,
we can define "Borel", "continuous" and "smooth" versions
of group cohomology H^n(G,A) by taking the usual
chain complex for group cohomology and adding the
requirement that the n-cocycles f: G^n -> A be Borel
measurable, continuous or smooth functions.
I would like to know H^3(G,A) for all three versions
when G is a compact Lie group and A is R or U(1), with
G acting trivially on A.
In Daniel Baker's paper "Differential characters and Borel
cohomology", he seems to say that
H^n_{Borel}(G,U(1)) = H^n(g,R)
where H^n(g,R) is the cohomology of the Lie algebra of a
compact Lie group G with coefficients in the trivial representation
on R. So, for example, we'd get R as our cohomology group when
G is compact simple and n = 3.
In Jim Stasheff's paper "Continuous cohomology of groups
and classifying spaces", he says that
H^n_{continuous}(G,R) = 0
whenever G is a compact Lie group.
I still need to read Hochschild and Mostow's paper "Cohomology of
Lie groups", which is earlier than these others... but the library
closed before I got to it!
I guess the cases I'm really most curious about are
H^3_{continuous}(G,U(1))
and
H^3_{smooth}(G,U(1))
I have a feeling these vanish at least when G is compact simple,
but I don't actually know this!
- Next message: Robert Israel: "Re: multiplicative vs algebraic independence"
- Previous message: Volker Runde: "Re: Derivations on l^infinity(Z)"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
|