Re: direct sums and products from category theory
From: Arturo Magidin (magidin_at_math.berkeley.edu)
Date: 09/20/04
- Previous message: Arturo Magidin: "Re: direct sums and products from category theory"
- In reply to: Arturo Magidin: "Re: direct sums and products from category theory"
- Next in thread: Todd Trimble: "Re: direct sums and products from category theory"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: 19 Sep 2004 20:15:00 -0400
In article <cikukt$4ah$1@dizzy.math.ohio-state.edu>,
Arturo Magidin <magidin@math.berkeley.edu> wrote:
Sigh... I always get these two confused. My most sincere apologies!
>More generally, left adjoints respect limits, and right adjoints
>respect colimits;
Exactly the other way around: left adjoints respect colimits; right
adjoints respect limits.
Since "underlying set" is the right adjoint of the "underlying
set-free object" pair, that means that the underlying set of the limit
is the limit of the underlying sets. E.g., "the underlying set of the
product is the product of the underlying sets." Free object is the
left adjoint, which is why the free object on a disjoint union of sets
is the coproduct of the free objects on the sets; e.g., the free group
on X (disjoint union) Y is the free product of F(X) and F(Y).
--
======================================================================
"It's not denial. I'm just very selective about
what I accept as reality."
--- Calvin ("Calvin and Hobbes")
======================================================================
Arturo Magidin
magidin@math.berkeley.edu
- Previous message: Arturo Magidin: "Re: direct sums and products from category theory"
- In reply to: Arturo Magidin: "Re: direct sums and products from category theory"
- Next in thread: Todd Trimble: "Re: direct sums and products from category theory"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]