Summability theory
From: Nick Singer (nsinger2_at_cox.net)
Date: 09/21/04
- Previous message: David C. Ullrich: "Re: Unitarization of Banach algebras with approximate identities"
- Next in thread: Robert Israel: "Re: Summability theory"
- Reply: Robert Israel: "Re: Summability theory"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: 21 Sep 2004 16:45:02 -0400
Consider the series sum_{n>=1} f(n)/n, where f maps the positive
integers into the two-element set {-1,1}.
(1) What are necessary and sufficient conditions on f to ensure
convergence? Partial "necessary" answer from Cesaro: the limit of
the ratio of positive terms to negative terms, if it exists, must be
1. Possibly Littlewood's theorem could help here: it's summable
if the terms are O(1/n) [yes, they are], and the series is Abel
summable [maybe...]. How about something of the form
sum {n=1 to N} f(n) = O(log N), or some such slow-growing function of
N ?
Now consider a generalization: the series sum_{n>=1} f(n)/g(n), where
f is as before and g is any positive, strictly increasing function,
e.g. g(n) = log(log(n+20)).
(2) Now what are necessary and sufficient conditions on f to ensure
convergence? The Cesaro condition is still necessary. Littlewood's
theorem doesn't help anymore if g(n) grows more slowly than n.
Thanks for your help,
Nick
- Previous message: David C. Ullrich: "Re: Unitarization of Banach algebras with approximate identities"
- Next in thread: Robert Israel: "Re: Summability theory"
- Reply: Robert Israel: "Re: Summability theory"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
|