Re: Winternitz Theorem
From: Dan Luecking (Look-In-Sig_at_uark.edu)
Date: 09/25/04
- Next message: William Elliot: "Re: lattice theory"
- Previous message: Geometry and Topology Journal: "Paper published by Geometry and Topology"
- In reply to: Gerry Myerson: "Re: Winternitz Theorem"
- Next in thread: Gareth McCaughan: "Re: Winternitz Theorem"
- Reply: Gareth McCaughan: "Re: Winternitz Theorem"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Sat, 25 Sep 2004 14:30:03 +0000 (UTC)
On Fri, 24 Sep 2004 14:00:06 +0000 (UTC), Gerry Myerson
<gerry@maths.mq.edi.ai.i2u4email> wrote:
>In article <civrim$kmg$1@news.ks.uiuc.edu>,
> andreas wagener <108076@gmx.net> wrote:
>
>
>Here's something from Math Reviews that may be of use.
>
>MR1099773 (92e:52010)
> Scott, P. R.(5-ADLD)
> On the union of convex bodies with no interior point in common.
> Mathematika 37 (1990), no. 2, 245--250.
>52A35 (52A20)
>
> Let $K_1,\cdots,K_{d+1}$ be $d+1$ convex bodies in $d$-dimensional
>Euclidean space which have no interior point in common. The author shows
>that $m(\bigcup_iK_i)\geq C_d\min_jm(K_j)$, where $i$ and $j$ vary from
>$1$ to $d+1$, $C_d$ is a constant depending only on the dimension and
>$m(·)$ is the measure of the set.
Am I missing something? How is this not trivial with $C_d = d+1$?
Dan
-- Dan Luecking Department of Mathematical Sciences University of Arkansas Fayetteville, Arkansas 72701 To reply by email, change Look-In-Sig to luecking
- Next message: William Elliot: "Re: lattice theory"
- Previous message: Geometry and Topology Journal: "Paper published by Geometry and Topology"
- In reply to: Gerry Myerson: "Re: Winternitz Theorem"
- Next in thread: Gareth McCaughan: "Re: Winternitz Theorem"
- Reply: Gareth McCaughan: "Re: Winternitz Theorem"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|