Re: Proofs of theorems and Symmetries
From: Noam D.Elkies (elkies_AT_m_at_h.harvard.edu)
Date: 09/26/04
- Previous message: Philip reny: "Re: lattice theory"
- In reply to: tchow_at_lsa.umich.edu: "Re: Proofs of theorems and Symmetries"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Sun, 26 Sep 2004 02:00:02 +0000 (UTC)
In article <cil7e6$4f1$1@dizzy.math.ohio-state.edu>,
<tchow@lsa.umich.edu> wrote:
>In article <cieo0l$oo$1@dizzy.math.ohio-state.edu>,
>Eric Chopin <eric_chopin@hotmail.com> wrote:
>> My "conjecture" is that, if T is a proovable theorem such that there
>> exists one proof which does not require the axiom of choice, and S a
>> symmetry property such that both the hypothesis and the conclusion are
>> symmetric with regards to S, then there exists a proof P of T such that
>> T is explicitely symmetric with regards to S at any stage.
> [...]
> I think your conjecture is a useful heuristic that may help you create
> beautiful mathematics.
> [...]
I agree, but feel compelled to point out a flip side:
once one recognizes the ubiquity and power of symmetry,
one can become so attached to it that it becomes difficult
to pursue any attempt at a solution that does not respect
the full group of known symmetries of a problem. Sometimes
one does have to break symmetry to make progress -- even
as the symmetry is kept in mind as a check on the final answer.
One example that comes to mind is the theory of finite-dimensional
representations of a Lie algebra, where we begin by choosing a maximal torus.
NDE
- Previous message: Philip reny: "Re: lattice theory"
- In reply to: tchow_at_lsa.umich.edu: "Re: Proofs of theorems and Symmetries"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|