Re: Algorithmic complexity of a graph
From: Eray Ozkural exa (erayo_at_bilkent.edu.tr)
Date: 10/14/04
- Next message: Alex.Lupas: "Number Theory F in Z[x]..."
- Previous message: mandro: "Re: Ricci and Weyl tensors in GR"
- In reply to: Felix Goldberg: "Re: Algorithmic complexity of a graph"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: 13 Oct 2004 17:56:46 -0700
felixg@techunix.technion.ac.il (Felix Goldberg) wrote in message news:<49fff586.0410080509.41e8e8d5@posting.google.com>...
> caterina <caterina.mora@uibk.ac.at> wrote in message news:<rwff2c1dqg8q@legacy>...
> > Hi!
> >
> > I don't know if this is the right place to ask this question, but I
> > have no other ideas...
> >
> > Does by chance anyone know of a definition of the ALGORITHMIC (or
> > Kolmogorov) complexity of a graph? And, in case, could you suggest
> > where I could look for it?
> >
> > I have only found definitions of computational complexity...
> >
> > Thanks a lot!!!
> >
> > cat
>
>
> Well, I reckon you could fix some system of notation and count the
> bits necessary to describe a graph in such a system - for instance you
> could count the 1's in the adjacency matrix.
>
> Apropos, the number of spanning trees is often called the "complexity"
> of a graph. Depending on your needs, you might find this a useful
> messure too.
Obviously it's the Kolmogorov complexity of the adjacency matrix,
which can be easily encoded as a bitstring. (Any bitstring
representation should do) Have a look at the lecture notes of
Alexander Shen on the web. (section 'incompressible graphs' IIRC)
http://user.it.uu.se/~vorobyov/Courses/KC/2000/
Regards,
-- Eray
- Next message: Alex.Lupas: "Number Theory F in Z[x]..."
- Previous message: mandro: "Re: Ricci and Weyl tensors in GR"
- In reply to: Felix Goldberg: "Re: Algorithmic complexity of a graph"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|