monoidal derived categories
From: Urs Schreiber (Urs.Schreiber_at_uni-essen.de)
Date: 03/14/05
- Next message: Andrew Scott: "complex projective geometry question"
- Previous message: Simone Severini: "Quantum Information Theory Workshop"
- Next in thread: Aaron Bergman: "Re: monoidal derived categories"
- Reply: Aaron Bergman: "Re: monoidal derived categories"
- Reply: Dan Christensen: "Re: monoidal derived categories"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2005 21:04:57 +0100
I am in the process of trying to understand some aspects of derived
categories. In particular, I would like to understand monoidal structures on
derived categories
D(C)
which come from monoidal C.
Certainly I have not looked at the right place, but what I have found is a
remark in math.KT/0209029 where the author says (in application 2.1)
"Supppose (C,\otimes,e) is a monoidal category such that the underlying
category C is an exact category, and such that \otimes is an exact functor.
Then \otimes can be extended naturally to the bounded derived category
D^b(C) and it is not difficult to see that D^b(C) becomes in this way a
suspended monoidal category, whose unit object is simply e considered as an
object of D^b(C) in the usual way [...]"
My problem is that right now I do find it difficult to see this. Probably I
am missing something.
I'd guess that if
0 -> E1 -d1-> E2 -d2-> ...
is an object in D^b(C) (i.e. a complex in C) and
0 -> F1 -d'1-> F2 -d'2-> ...
is another one, then their \otimes-product should be the complex
0 -> E1 \otimes F1 - d1 \otimes d'1-> E2 \otimes F2 -> ...
Now with e the unit object in C it seems to me that by the above description
the unit object in D^b(C) would be
0 -> e -> 0 -> 0 -> ....
But that does not seem to be right. How does it really work?
Actually, I have a specific example which is what I am really interested in:
Given a graph and its graph category G, the functors
f : G -> Vect
form a monoidal category, Rep(G), with the product coming from the tensor
product in Vect.
I would like to understand any monoidal structure induced by that on the
derived category D(Rep(G)) of Rep(G).
- Next message: Andrew Scott: "complex projective geometry question"
- Previous message: Simone Severini: "Quantum Information Theory Workshop"
- Next in thread: Aaron Bergman: "Re: monoidal derived categories"
- Reply: Aaron Bergman: "Re: monoidal derived categories"
- Reply: Dan Christensen: "Re: monoidal derived categories"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
|