Lie groups that are not matrix groups
From: Zig (ziggurism_at_gmail.com)
Date: 03/29/05
- Previous message: Ioannis: "On Extending hyper4 and Knuth's Up-arrow Notation to the Reals"
- Next in thread: Jyrki Lahtonen: "Re: Lie groups that are not matrix groups"
- Reply: Jyrki Lahtonen: "Re: Lie groups that are not matrix groups"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2005 02:00:07 +0000 (UTC)
So in the book Representation Theory by Fulton and Harris, they're
classifying Lie algebras of dimension 3 in one of their beginning
chapters. It made me want to ask some questions about Lie groups which
are not matrix Lie groups, i.e. have no faithful finite dimensional
representations.
Let me briefly describe the stuff in the text. They get to the real
Lie algebra [X,Y]=[X,Z]=0, [Y,Z]=X, and goes on to exponentiate some
representation of the algebra to get the group G of upper triangular
3x3 matrices with 1s along the diagonal. This group has center R,
matrices with the only nonzero entry in the upper corner. To get other
Lie groups with some algebra, they take the quotient of G/N with N any
discrete normal subgroup, which must therefore be central. Z being a
discrete normal subgroup, G/Z is the only other group with this
algebra, presumably G/nZ will be isomorphic.
Then he proves that this group has no faithful irreps: if it did, the
center, S^1, would be proportional to the identity in that irrep, and
we would have [Y,Z]~1, but tr[Y,Z]=0.
My first question is about this proof. I can't understand why this
proof doesn't apply to the covering group G (which clearly does have
finite dimensional faithful reps). I think its center R should also be
proportional to the identity in an irrep. The difference between the
two cases is that S^1 is compact, while R is not. But so what? Did I
miss the theorem in the book where he showed that a compact central
subgroup must be proportional to the identity? Does not Schur's lemma
apply to anything that commutes with the whole group?
He also talks about how the tower of covers of SL(2) are not matrix
groups. And I seem to recall once hearing that the universal cover of
GL(n) is not a matrix group. These Lie groups that are not matrix
groups seem a bit mysterious. Is there a general way to find groups
who are not matrix groups? Or turn one that is not into one that is?
What are some others? I think I've heard that the universal cover of
GL(n) is not. Is that right? What about Spin(n)? The Spin(n)s that
I've met have been, but I've never seen a general case.
thanks
zig
- Previous message: Ioannis: "On Extending hyper4 and Knuth's Up-arrow Notation to the Reals"
- Next in thread: Jyrki Lahtonen: "Re: Lie groups that are not matrix groups"
- Reply: Jyrki Lahtonen: "Re: Lie groups that are not matrix groups"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|