Re: Is Hol(D) a nice subset of B(H)?
- From: "Dan" <luecking@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: 19 Sep 2005 20:15:01 -0400
Lee Rudolph wrote:
> Ali Taghavi <alitghv@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
>
>
> >> By "a neighborhood", I take you to mean that the
> >> neighborhood can vary
> >> with the map, so that more precisely Hol(D) is the
> >> set of all *germs*
> >> of holomorphic maps from D to C. If that is the
> >> case,
> >
> >The analytic continutity implies we do not need to use "germ"
I'm not sure what that means, but...
>
> In the only sense in what you write is correct, you
> are indeed *interpreting* elements of Hol(D) as certain
> continuous functions on D, so that for you Hol(D) is
> squeezed between two well-known and well-loved Banach
> algebras: it is a subset of C(D), the Banach algebra
> of all continuous functions on D, and a superset of
> the subalgebra of C(D) containing just those continuous
> functions on D that are holomorphic on Int D. You are
> no closer to telling us what topology you want to put
> on Hol(D). Do you want to give it the incomplete metric
> induced by its inclusion in C(D)? If not, what?
Since he is viewing these functions as elements of B(H) there is no
need to consider another topology: use that of B(H).
However, he has not said in what sense they belong to B(H) when H is
l^2. There are two common ways:
1. Identify f(z) with the diagonal operator which has the power series
coefficients of the power series for f on the diagonal. This is often
called a coefficient multiplier.
2. Identify elements of l^2 with power series (the Hardy space H^2) and
f(z) with the operator of multiplication by itself. (This is often
called an analytic Toeplitz operator.)
Probably not the first is intended, as then f corresponds to a compact
operator and is never Fredholm (if f has radius of convergence greater
than 1). Possibly the second is meant, in which case f corresponds to a
Fredholm operator if and only if it has no zeros on the unit circle.
As to whether this is a retract in Fred(H), I have no idea, though it
seems possible.
Dan
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Is Hol(D) a nice subset of B(H)?
- From: Lee Rudolph
- Re: Is Hol(D) a nice subset of B(H)?
- References:
- Re: Is Hol(D) a nice subset of B(H)?
- From: Ali Taghavi
- Re: Is Hol(D) a nice subset of B(H)?
- From: Lee Rudolph
- Re: Is Hol(D) a nice subset of B(H)?
- Prev by Date: Abacus and "dust numerals" (Re: TWFiMP Week 221)
- Next by Date: Re: Is Hol(D) a nice subset of B(H)?
- Previous by thread: Re: Is Hol(D) a nice subset of B(H)?
- Next by thread: Re: Is Hol(D) a nice subset of B(H)?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|