Re: complex orthogonal group
- From: Ilya Zakharevich <nospam-abuse@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 4 Oct 2005 05:48:40 +0000 (UTC)
[A complimentary Cc of this posting was sent to
Tobias Fritz
<tfritz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>], who wrote in article <Pine.LNX.4.62.0510032230470.13099@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
You send a "blind Cc" copy (as not marked as a copy of a posting).
Now I need to copy my reply to you here. Please do not send blind Cc's.
> >Any good thorough book on linear algebra (i.e., designed not for
> >teaching students) will contain the spectral theorem over an
> >algebraically closed case.
> Though I have to admit that I did not check really thoroughly, I
> doubt that this is true. A key assumption in the proof of the
> standard (finite-dim) spectral theorem for normal operators is that
> the orthogonal complement of a subspace has trivial intersection
> with that subspace; this fails for the C^n case, since it has null
> vectors.
The conclusion of the complex spectral theorem is different (comparing
to the positive real case). As I said, in addition to 1x1 Jordan
block (as in real positive case) larger blocks can appear.
But each block has (in addition to its size) exactly one parameter:
the eigenvalue - exactly as in the real positive case.
Hope this helps,
Ilya
.
- References:
- complex orthogonal group
- From: Tobias Fritz
- Re: complex orthogonal group
- From: Ilya Zakharevich
- Re: complex orthogonal group
- From: Tobias Fritz
- complex orthogonal group
- Prev by Date: Re: complex orthogonal group
- Next by Date: Re: complex orthogonal group
- Previous by thread: Re: complex orthogonal group
- Next by thread: Re: complex orthogonal group
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|