Re: This Week's Finds in Mathematical Physics (Week 226)
- From: Aaron Bergman <abergman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2006 20:19:43 -0600
In article <dsirrc$pno$1@xxxxxxxxxxxx>,
baez@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (John Baez) wrote:
In fact, the existence of a one-way function would imply that
"P does not equal NP". But, proving or disproving this claim is one
of the most profound unsolved math problems around. If you settle it,
you'll get a million dollars from the Clay Mathematics Institute:
This brings to mind a question I was wondering about. Given an NP
(-complete?) problem, is it ever possible to engineer a (partial)
differential equation, the solution of which, if known, would solve the
NP problem?
I realize this is vague. The general thought was whether a continuous
dymanical system can somehow be more computationally powerful than
something discrete.
Aaron
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: This Week's Finds in Mathematical Physics (Week 226)
- From: John Baez
- Re: This Week's Finds in Mathematical Physics (Week 226)
- References:
- This Week's Finds in Mathematical Physics (Week 226)
- From: John Baez
- This Week's Finds in Mathematical Physics (Week 226)
- Prev by Date: This Week's Finds in Mathematical Physics (Week 226)
- Next by Date: What is Sum(1/p log p)?
- Previous by thread: This Week's Finds in Mathematical Physics (Week 226)
- Next by thread: Re: This Week's Finds in Mathematical Physics (Week 226)
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|