Re: A Definition of an Algorithm
- From: "G. A. Edgar" <edgar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 25 Feb 2006 20:30:12 +0000 (UTC)
In article <dtprdr$88r$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <alex.lupas@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
It seems "algorithm" is defined in terms of the notion "implement thePerhaps.
same algorithm", so now all we need is the way do define this relation.
To define/or to describe the term "algorithm" by
means of some notions which include term "algorithm" ??
It is not so far-fetched. You often first define an equivalence
relation, then use the equivalence classes for your new notion. So
"order type" is defined in terms of "have the same order type" which is
also known as "order isomorphic". Or "cardinal" can be defined in
terms of "have the same cardinal" which is also known as "equipollent".
--
G. A. Edgar http://www.math.ohio-state.edu/~edgar/
.
- References:
- Re: A Definition of an Algorithm
- From: alex . lupas
- Re: A Definition of an Algorithm
- From: Aatu Koskensilta
- Re: A Definition of an Algorithm
- From: alex . lupas
- Re: A Definition of an Algorithm
- From: A N Niel
- Re: A Definition of an Algorithm
- From: alex . lupas
- Re: A Definition of an Algorithm
- Prev by Date: semialgebraic sets and integrability
- Next by Date: Two papers published by Geometry & Topology
- Previous by thread: Re: A Definition of an Algorithm
- Next by thread: Re: A Definition of an Algorithm
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|