Re: Are sheaves a symmetric monoidal closed category?
- From: "Agusti Roig" <soquiso@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 20 Feb 2007 07:31:06 -0500
Jannick Asmus ha escrit:
Please let me know whether this is helpful for you.
Indeed it was!
I think you have to forget to talk about elements of objects of C
like [F(V), G(V)] , but, if I'm not wrong this doesn't matter because
one can write your idea in the following "element-free" way.
First, you have a bifunctor
Open(X) x Open(X)^op ---> C
where Open(X) is the category of open sets of X , defined on
objects by
( V , V' ) |---> [F(V), G(V')] .
Assuming that C is complete, this bifunctor has an end, which is a
functor
Open(X)^op ---> C
and is exactly your U |---> P(U) .
Moreover, since an end is a limit it commutes with other limits. So
this presheaf is in fact a sheaf!
As for the fact of being adjoint to the tensor product, it seems to me
that, playing a little with ends, it works.
Thank you very much!
Agust? Roig
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Are sheaves a symmetric monoidal closed category?
- From: Agusti Roig
- Re: Are sheaves a symmetric monoidal closed category?
- References:
- Are sheaves a symmetric monoidal closed category?
- From: Agusti Roig
- Re: Are sheaves a symmetric monoidal closed category?
- From: Jannick Asmus
- Are sheaves a symmetric monoidal closed category?
- Prev by Date: principal ideals
- Next by Date: BSU(n)
- Previous by thread: Re: Are sheaves a symmetric monoidal closed category?
- Next by thread: Re: Are sheaves a symmetric monoidal closed category?
- Index(es):
Loading