First diagnal proof for real numbers
- From: WM <mueckenh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 11 May 2007 03:39:07 -0700
In his original paper of 1891 G. Cantor does not consider the fact
that dual representation of real numbers can spoil his diagonal proof.
(In fact Cantor treats sequences in general.) Today it is known that
the substitution rule for real numbers in n-ary representation has to
exclude replacement of n-1 by 0 and vice versa. Although E. Zermelo,
the editor of Cantor's collected works, mentioned this already in 1932
(G. Cantor, Gesammelte Werke, p. 280-281) it seems unclear who was the
first to give the correct diagonal proof for real numbers. Regards, WM
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: First diagnal proof for real numbers
- From: Dave L. Renfro
- Re: First diagnal proof for real numbers
- From: Keith Ramsay
- Re: First diagnal proof for real numbers
- Prev by Date: Re: Physical Applications of Tetration
- Next by Date: Re: First diagnal proof for real numbers
- Previous by thread: Re: Physical Applications of Tetration
- Next by thread: Re: First diagnal proof for real numbers
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|