Defense: Problems with "canonical"
- From: "Christian Reinbothe" <Christian.Reinbothe@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 14 Oct 2007 20:45:26 +0200
----- Original Message -----
From: "Christian Reinbothe" <Christian.Reinbothe@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Newsgroups: sci.math.research
Sent: Monday, October 08, 2007 9:46 PM
Subject: Problems with "canonical"
Hallo,
this contribution is meant seriously. Please do not judge
precipitately, but visit the following website
http://www.Reinbothe.DE
Then click on the link "Mathematical Preprints" and
load the *.pdf-document "Problems with "canonical"".
1. I cannot define the term "canonical base of Rx...xR".
I need a mathematical correct definition of the term "canonical".
2. In the book "Kategorien" of S. MacLane (ISBN 3-540-05634-3)
can be found several definitions of "canonical ...", but not a
definition of "canonical base of Rx..xR".
(As far as I understand it.)
3. In further literature there is the term "__THE__ canonical
isomorphism V -> V^**". In 4.3. of the above mentioned
preprints the term is not usable, because you get
__TWO__ "canonical" isomorphisms V -> V^**.
Somewhere here must be an error. :)
Greetings Christian
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Defense: Problems with "canonical"
- From: LD
- Re: Defense: Problems with "canonical"
- From: MrKofner
- Re: Defense: Problems with "canonical"
- From: Andrew D. Hwang
- Re: Defense: Problems with "canonical"
- From: David C. Ullrich
- Re: Defense: Problems with "canonical"
- Prev by Date: Re: Unsolved Quaternion problem is now solved!
- Next by Date: Set combinations , sets as arrays, rank
- Previous by thread: CFP: International MultiConference of Engineers and Computer Scientists IMECS 2008
- Next by thread: Re: Defense: Problems with "canonical"
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
