Re: Anyone wanna help with a compression routine (new type)
- From: Virgil <Virgil@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 26 Dec 2007 21:30:01 +0000 (UTC)
In article <fks3ss$a69$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
WM <mueckenh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I am interested in the set of *all* natural numbers. (In order to
minimize the problem use the set of numbers between 10^10^100 and
10^10^101.) Why do I ask? We know any conceivable program consists of
far less than 10^78 bits (the number of hydrogen atoms in the
universe). Therefore we can say: Unless it is possible to construct a
number by such a program, we will never have a chance to use it in any
mathemastical sense. Hence it would be a fairly "useless" claim if we
claimed that such a number existed.
That "most" numbers are useless to WM in no way eliminates them from the
mathematical universe.
.
- References:
- Re: Anyone wanna help with a compression routine (new type)
- From: WM
- Re: Anyone wanna help with a compression routine (new type)
- From: Ilya Zakharevich
- Re: Anyone wanna help with a compression routine (new type)
- From: WM
- Re: Anyone wanna help with a compression routine (new type)
- From: Ian Parker
- Re: Anyone wanna help with a compression routine (new type)
- From: WM
- Re: Anyone wanna help with a compression routine (new type)
- From: Virgil
- Re: Anyone wanna help with a compression routine (new type)
- From: WM
- Re: Anyone wanna help with a compression routine (new type)
- From: Ian Parker
- Re: Anyone wanna help with a compression routine (new type)
- From: WM
- Re: Anyone wanna help with a compression routine (new type)
- Prev by Date: Irreducibility of certain polynomials...
- Next by Date: Order dimension and topological dimension
- Previous by thread: Re: Anyone wanna help with a compression routine (new type)
- Next by thread: Re: Anyone wanna help with a compression routine (new type)
- Index(es):
Loading