Re: Converging sum of reciprocals
- From: Gerry Myerson <gerry@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 1 May 2008 01:30:01 +0000 (UTC)
In article <fvaq6r$89i$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
"joeshipman@xxxxxxx" <JoeShipman@xxxxxxx> wrote:
Let X_3 be the set of positive integers constructed by sieving out all
integers that are the sum of two earlier ones in the set:
1,2,4,5,10,11,13,14,28,29,31,32,37,38,40,41,82,...
Then 5 shouldn't be in there, should it?
X_3 contains no arithmetic progressions of length 3.
Is there some connection between no number a sum of two others
and no 3-term arithmetic progressions?
The sum of the reciprocals of the first 2^16 elements of X_3 is
3.004209955... The Erdos-Turan conjecture states that any set of
positive integers whose sum of reciprocals converges contains
arbitrarily long arithmetic progressions,
I think you mean "diverges."
--
Gerry Myerson (gerry@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx) (i -> u for email)
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Converging sum of reciprocals
- From: Robert Israel
- Re: Converging sum of reciprocals
- References:
- Converging sum of reciprocals
- From: joeshipman@xxxxxxx
- Converging sum of reciprocals
- Prev by Date: Re: two questions about vector fields
- Next by Date: Re: Converging sum of reciprocals
- Previous by thread: Converging sum of reciprocals
- Next by thread: Re: Converging sum of reciprocals
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|