Re: Confused by symbol in equation
From: Paul Burridge (pb_at_notthisbit.osiris1.co.uk)
Date: 07/23/04
- Next message: Z. Zeng: "Re: High Precision Approximate GCD"
- Previous message: W. D. Allen Sr.: "Re: Dumb question on imaginary numbers"
- In reply to: Robert Israel: "Re: Confused by symbol in equation"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Fri, 23 Jul 2004 23:03:01 +0100
On 23 Jul 2004 19:24:07 GMT, israel@math.ubc.ca (Robert Israel) wrote:
>In article <0he2g0940bp1de0tcmncq4jc7r5la1l59h@4ax.com>,
>Paul Burridge <pb@notthisbit.osiris1.co.uk> wrote:
>
>>Do you guys use a binary group to post equations to that I could scan
>>and post mine to? I find the limititions of ASCII too much to cope
>>with!
>
>No, we don't. We mostly use pseudo-TeX notation (e.g. ^ for superscript
>and _ for subscript). BTW, please don't send questions such as this to
>sci.math.symbolic, which is for discussions about computer algebra
>systems, not symbols in mathematics.
Okay, noted. I just wonder... Oh, I'll save it for sci.math.
Thanks!
p.
-- "What is now proved was once only imagin'd." - William Blake, 1793.
- Next message: Z. Zeng: "Re: High Precision Approximate GCD"
- Previous message: W. D. Allen Sr.: "Re: Dumb question on imaginary numbers"
- In reply to: Robert Israel: "Re: Confused by symbol in equation"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
