Re: Compute the limit of x/exp(x) when x approaches positive infinite?

From: Julian V. Noble (jvn_at_virginia.edu)
Date: 08/10/04

  • Next message: Fred the Wonder Worm: "Re: Fibonacci[1,000,000,000] contains 208,987,640 decimal digits"
    Date: Tue, 10 Aug 2004 16:20:11 -0400
    
    

    Daniel Mark wrote:
    >
    > Hello all:
    >
    > I want to compute the limit of formula x/exp(x) when x approaches positive
    > infinite.
    >
    > I use the following procedure to prove that it is 0.
    > Is this method correct?
    >
    > 1> 0 <= x/exp(x) <= x/x^2 = 1/x when x approaches positive infinite.
    >
    > 2> 0 <= x/exp(x) <= 1/x = 0 when x approaches positive infinite.
    >
    > 3> therefore, x/exp(x) ==> 0
    >
    > thank you
    > -Daniel

    You could use L'Hopital's Rule, which is probably what your instructor
    intended. See Grossman, Calculus (3rd ed, ch. 12) or search Google online.
    For example,

       http://www.ltcconline.net/greenl/courses/106/approxother/LHOP.HTM

    has a reasonably clear explanation based on the Mean Value Theorem. Keep
    in mind that you can only use L'Hopital's Rule to find the limit of f(x)/g(x)
    when both functions go to 0 or infinity. If one remains finite [or bounded,
    as in the case cos(x)/ln(x) ] you don't get the right limit.

    -- 
    Julian V. Noble
    Professor Emeritus of Physics
    jvn@lessspamformother.virginia.edu
        ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
    http://galileo.phys.virginia.edu/~jvn/
       "For there was never yet philosopher that could endure the toothache
          patiently."  -- Wm. Shakespeare, Much Ado about Nothing. Act v. Sc. 1.
    

  • Next message: Fred the Wonder Worm: "Re: Fibonacci[1,000,000,000] contains 208,987,640 decimal digits"

    Relevant Pages

    • Re: Compute the limit of x/exp(x) when x approaches positive infinite?
      ... In sci.math.symbolic, Daniel Mark ... > infinite. ... The usefulness of this approach for your result is ... It's still legal to go .sigless. ...
      (sci.math.symbolic)
    • Re: Reading Dawkins ... was "Scrump"
      ... such an explanation now, so an alternative would have to be ... Some physicists, by the way, would like to find an explanation for the ... postulating a God to explain the universe gives ... you an infinite regress--unless your method for stopping the regress ...
      (alt.usage.english)
    • Re: Uncle assAl: (SR) Lorentz t, x = Intervals
      ... > before they've mastered algebra, or algebra before arthmetic, do you? ... > Michelson was still working on it on 1905 and Einstein was still riding ... > prove he meant infinite, but I doubt you can understand it. ... Thank you for that good explanation. ...
      (sci.math)
    • Re: Uncle assAl: (SR) Lorentz t, x = Intervals
      ... > before they've mastered algebra, or algebra before arthmetic, do you? ... > Michelson was still working on it on 1905 and Einstein was still riding ... > prove he meant infinite, but I doubt you can understand it. ... Thank you for that good explanation. ...
      (sci.physics)
    • Re: Uncle assAl: (SR) Lorentz t, x = Intervals
      ... > before they've mastered algebra, or algebra before arthmetic, do you? ... > Michelson was still working on it on 1905 and Einstein was still riding ... > prove he meant infinite, but I doubt you can understand it. ... Thank you for that good explanation. ...
      (sci.physics.relativity)

    Loading