Re: subs() function in Maple V R5
From: Robert Israel (israel_at_math.ubc.ca)
Date: 08/19/04
- Next message: Paul Abbott: "Re: Mathematica Vs. Matlab"
- Previous message: Bill Rowe: "Re: Mathematica Vs. Matlab"
- In reply to: Mark Morse: "Re: subs() function in Maple V R5"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: 19 Aug 2004 06:28:28 GMT
In article <7ba41bbf.0408181539.5da4be62@posting.google.com>,
Mark Morse <dolphin4444@excite.com> wrote:
>Carl Devore <devore@math.udel.edu> wrote:
>> It is the order of evaluation. Arguments are usually evaluated before
>> being passed to a procedure. 0^n evaluates to 0. The subs never sees the
>> n.
>This is interesting. Maple is able to pre-evaluate the expression 0^n
>as 0 without knowing the value of n.
Yes, this particular "feature" is a cause of frequent complaints.
I don't know why it wasn't fixed ages ago, unless it's a "backwards
compatibility" problem.
>Does Maple always assume that variables are positive?
No, usually it's pretty good at not making unjustified assumptions.
Robert Israel israel@math.ubc.ca
Department of Mathematics http://www.math.ubc.ca/~israel
University of British Columbia
Vancouver, BC, Canada V6T 1Z2
- Next message: Paul Abbott: "Re: Mathematica Vs. Matlab"
- Previous message: Bill Rowe: "Re: Mathematica Vs. Matlab"
- In reply to: Mark Morse: "Re: subs() function in Maple V R5"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|