Re: Nilpotent matrix
From: Stephen Bianchi (swbianchi_at_earthlink.net)
Date: 09/26/04
- Previous message: steve_H: "[mma] can one installl mma 5.0 student version on more than one PC?"
- Next in thread: Robert Israel: "Re: Nilpotent matrix"
- Reply: Robert Israel: "Re: Nilpotent matrix"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Sun, 26 Sep 2004 00:23:57 +0000 (UTC)
On 27 Jan 2000 21:34:34 GMT, Robert Israel wrote:
>In article <01bf68f6$ea6fc420$dda0a98e@default>,
> "Serge Garneau" <garnote@globetrotter.qc.ca> writes:
>
>> Question 1 : Is it possible to generate a nilpotent randmatrix of
index p
>> ?
>
>I don't know how to find one that's uniformly distributed over the
manifold
>of all such matrices. But you might do the following:
>
>1) Choose n random vectors v1,...,vn, forming a random basis of R^n.
>2) Choose integers p = p1 >= p2 >= ... >= pr where p1 + p2 + ... + pr
= n.
>
>Construct a matrix N which is all 0 except for square blocks of sizes
p1, p2, ...,
>pr on the diagonal, each block having 1's on the first superdiagonal
and 0's
>elsewhere. Then do a change of basis, i.e. A = B N B^(-1) where B is
>the matrix whose columns are v1,...,vn.
>
>> Question 2 : If I have a square matrix A of order n, is it
possible to
>> find
>> his index of nipotence without try A , AA , AAA
, AAAA
>> ... ?
>
>Take a random vector v and compute v1 = A v, v2 = A v1, ... until vp
= 0.
>Then with probability 1, p is the index of nilpotence.
>
>> Question 3 : I suppose that the index of nilpotence of a matrix of
order n
>> is less than n+1. It's correct ?
>
>Yes, by the Cayley-Hamilton Theorem.
>
>Robert Israel israel@math.ubc.ca
>Department of Mathematics <a
href="http://www.math.ubc.ca/~israel">http://www.math.ubc.ca/~israel>
>University of British Columbia
>Vancouver, BC, Canada V6T 1Z2
Is there a way to prove Question 3, without using Cayley-Hamilton or
eigenvalues?
- Previous message: steve_H: "[mma] can one installl mma 5.0 student version on more than one PC?"
- Next in thread: Robert Israel: "Re: Nilpotent matrix"
- Reply: Robert Israel: "Re: Nilpotent matrix"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]