Re: [mma] GEMM: Selected Mathematica 5.0.1 Bugs - 4
From: Vladimir Bondarenko (vb_at_cybertester.com)
Date: 10/12/04
- Next message: MM: "Re: Variables defined in Maple?"
- Previous message: Robert Israel: "Re: Variables defined in Maple?"
- In reply to: Carlos Felippa: "Re: [mma] GEMM: Selected Mathematica 5.0.1 Bugs - 4"
- Next in thread: The Phantom: "Re: [mma] GEMM: Selected Mathematica 5.0.1 Bugs - 4"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: 12 Oct 2004 10:40:38 -0700
carlos@colorado.edu (Carlos Felippa) wrote in message news:<6bd3575.0410111949.64df529@posting.google.com>...
CF> Minor terminology correction: "regression" has a different meaning
CF> in English: return to a previous (less perfect) state.
Thanks. At times, I have an abominable, terrible habit of chanting to
my girlfriends Sonnets by Shakespeare 8-( It is natural I understand
(almost) all words there. Also, once I had a solid knowledge of Latin.
CF> If a bug wasnt present in a previous version it is just a new bug.
Thank you much for interest in my results, this is nice & refreshing.
Upon reading this you might decide that I am an extremely bad guy, a
real villain the baddy who seeks kicking each & every with a hammer by
head, for no discernible reason ;) Ahh, I am sure that you will be
much disappointed having learnt that actually I'm quite a polite
gentleman who shows discrimination in courtesy & amenity (at least,
many ladies reported me so :)
But it seems that the time has come to kill once & for good a strange
fallacy the long-liver often told me and by unknown reason advertised
by mathematicians & programmers & student users in sci.math.symbolic &
comp.soft-sys.math.maple - just the same you had produced. Even the
most serious & competent researchers (who aren't professional software
testers) by a reason I cannot realize, keep using this invalid
terminology.
Okay, for starters, couldn't you please consider an idea of visiting
my experience here http://www.cas-testing.org/index.php?list=3 ?
Also, why don't consider reading opinions about quality & scope of my
work produced by experts in the field of computer algebra systems
placed here http://www.cas-testing.org/index.php?list=7 ?
COMMENT 1 Albert D. Rich www.derive.com www.mulisp.com
COMMENT 2 Prof Dr Oleg Marichev (WRI) www.functions.wolfram.com
COMMENT 3 Dr Anwar Shiekh (WRI) Test Development Group Supervisor
COMMENT 4 Prof Dr Walter Oevel (SciFace GmbH)
http://www.math.uni-paderborn.de/~walter/
COMMENT 5 Dr Anwar Shiekh (WRI) Test Development Group Supervisor
COMMENT 6 Dr Anwar Shiekh (WRI) Test Development Group Supervisor
COMMENT 7 Dr Anwar Shiekh (WRI) Test Development Group Supervisor
COMMENT 8 Dr Michael Wester www.math.unm.edu/~wester
COMMENT 9 Dr Anwar Shiekh (WRI) Test Development Group Supervisor
COMMENT 10 Dr Anwar Shiekh (WRI) Test Development Group Supervisor
COMMENT 11 Stefan Wehmeier (SciFace GmbH)
http://www-math.uni-paderborn.de/~stefanw/
COMMENT 12 Dr Anwar Shiekh (WRI) Test Development Group Supervisor
COMMENT 13 Kelly Roach http://home.att.net/~themission/
COMMENT 14 Dr Anwar Shiekh (WRI) Test Development Group Supervisor
About those mysterious "regression bugs". Here you are
http://www.e-promag.com/epnewsletters/index.cfm?fuseaction=ShowNewsletterItem&ID=4694
A regression bug is one where a feature worked before, but a release
or update broke that feature so that it doesn't work or doesn't work
as expected.
http://www.mcse.ms/archive89-2004-1-280186.html
A "regression bug" is any bug that has been fixed, but that the fix
itself is either not correct (as in this case) or has caused some
other bug to occur.
http://www-10.lotus.com/ldd/r5fixlist.nsf/0/a2bc10f5bc66eec085256cb80055a8b1?OpenDocument
A regression bug is a bug that was introduced in a MR or MU that did
not exist in previous releases of that code stream. For example, a bug
that appears in R5.0.9 but did not exist in R5.0.8 is a regression
bug.
http://m1.mny.co.za/help/readme.nsf/0/4bcbe10112e1e01785256a07004a5e08?OpenDocument
A regression bug is a bug which was introduced in a QMR or QMU and did
not exist in previous releases of that code stream. For example, a bug
that appears in R5.0.4 but did not exist in R5.0.3 is a regression.
Some other comments are here
http://www.mail-archive.com/java2d-interest@capra.eng.sun.com/msg02176.html
[JAVA2D] 1.4 regression bug
http://www.mail-archive.com/wine-devel@winehq.com/msg10589.html
Subject: Re: Regression Bug in Wine MM (Bug #817)
http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list/2003-January/140976.html
regression bug in pywintypes SECURITY_ATTRIBUTES?
http://www.nedit.org/pipermail/discuss/2004-January/005527.html
scroll bug
Why it is so important for me to clarify this, and, for many readers
of sci.math.symbolic & comp.soft-sys.math.maple, to learn this?
Because I am going to make a historic speech that Maple 9.5.1 has been
enweaved with, at least, thousands regression bugs - to speak nothing
about even worse problems. Now this's significant in its consequences.
But I shall not rob you of the pleasure of enjoying my upcoming
results being published soon ;)
Best wishes,
Vladimir Bondarenko
GEMM architect
Co-founder, CEO, Mathematical Director
Cyber Tester, LLC
13 Dekabristov Str, Simferopol
Crimea 95000, Ukraine
tel: +38-(0652)-447325
tel: +38-(0652)-230243
tel: +38-(0652)-523144
fax: +38-(0652)-510700
http://www.cybertester.com/
http://maple.bug-list.org/
http://www.CAS-testing.org/
................................................................................
- Next message: MM: "Re: Variables defined in Maple?"
- Previous message: Robert Israel: "Re: Variables defined in Maple?"
- In reply to: Carlos Felippa: "Re: [mma] GEMM: Selected Mathematica 5.0.1 Bugs - 4"
- Next in thread: The Phantom: "Re: [mma] GEMM: Selected Mathematica 5.0.1 Bugs - 4"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|