Re: MuPad 3.0 extraction of individual eigenvectors
From: Christopher Creutzig (ccr_at_mupad.de)
Date: 11/15/04
- Next message: Sandy Goodell: "Re: Mathematica and PolyLogarithm"
- Previous message: Christopher Creutzig: "Re: MuPad 3.0 extraction of individual eigenvectors"
- In reply to: Brad Cooper: "Re: MuPad 3.0 extraction of individual eigenvectors"
- Next in thread: Christopher Creutzig: "Re: MuPad 3.0 extraction of individual eigenvectors"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Mon, 15 Nov 2004 17:55:54 +0100
Brad Cooper wrote:
> subx := transform::laplace(x(t),t,s) = X:
> suby := transform::laplace(y(t),t,s) = Y:
> Leqn1 := subs( xfrm1, subx, suby, x(0)=1);
> Leqn2 := subs( xfrm2, subx, suby, y(0)=-2);
You should really use subsex here. But I'll save your example
and consider it for the subsex documentation for sure.
> I also think a similar motivationally oriented example for op in
> the Help docs would be enough to nail what I see as a 0.01%
> deficiency. It would be good in the Help doc to see an
> example where op is used to extract (from fairly deep) part
> of an object produced by one command and fed into another.
Mentally noted.
> Currently subs shows op as a Related Function, but not the
> other way around. If this was fixed and two examples added
Going to be fixed, too.
> I hope you don't think I am being too presumptuous with my
> suggestions, but I think it helps sometimes if you can get
Feedback is definitely welcome!
cordially,
Christopher
- Next message: Sandy Goodell: "Re: Mathematica and PolyLogarithm"
- Previous message: Christopher Creutzig: "Re: MuPad 3.0 extraction of individual eigenvectors"
- In reply to: Brad Cooper: "Re: MuPad 3.0 extraction of individual eigenvectors"
- Next in thread: Christopher Creutzig: "Re: MuPad 3.0 extraction of individual eigenvectors"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]