In what sense does this vector "converge" to zero?
From: K Yee (kentonyee_at_hotmail.com)
Date: 11/26/04
- Next message: Luis A. Rodriguez: "Re: A restatement of the anti-Wolfram argument"
- Previous message: K Yee: "Re: what determines upper bound on eigenvalues of a covariance matrix?"
- Next in thread: A N Niel: "Re: In what sense does this vector "converge" to zero?"
- Reply: A N Niel: "Re: In what sense does this vector "converge" to zero?"
- Reply: puppet_sock_at_hotmail.com: "Re: In what sense does this vector "converge" to zero?"
- Reply: Robert Israel: "Re: In what sense does this vector "converge" to zero?"
- Reply: Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz: "Re: In what sense does this vector "converge" to zero?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: 26 Nov 2004 03:34:20 -0800
Let M be an nxn symmetric positive semidefinite matrix.
Suppose v is an n-tuplet that satisfy 2 conditions (only)
in the limit that n goes to infinity:
v' v -> 1
v' M v -> 0.
(i) Let w = M v.
Do the 2 conditions on v imply that in the n->infinity limit
w -> 0?
(ii) If (i) is not true, is it true that
w' w is finite or zero in some sense?
Thanks in advance!
Rod
- Next message: Luis A. Rodriguez: "Re: A restatement of the anti-Wolfram argument"
- Previous message: K Yee: "Re: what determines upper bound on eigenvalues of a covariance matrix?"
- Next in thread: A N Niel: "Re: In what sense does this vector "converge" to zero?"
- Reply: A N Niel: "Re: In what sense does this vector "converge" to zero?"
- Reply: puppet_sock_at_hotmail.com: "Re: In what sense does this vector "converge" to zero?"
- Reply: Robert Israel: "Re: In what sense does this vector "converge" to zero?"
- Reply: Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz: "Re: In what sense does this vector "converge" to zero?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|