Re: Mathematica vs. MACSYMA
From: Matthias (no_at_spam.pls)
Date: 12/21/04
- Next message: W. Dale Hall: "Re: Please help"
- Previous message: Brad Cooper: "Re: Maple bugs: Backward compatibility - 1"
- In reply to: symbio: "Mathematica vs. MACSYMA"
- Next in thread: Albert Reiner: "Re: Mathematica vs. MACSYMA"
- Reply: Albert Reiner: "Re: Mathematica vs. MACSYMA"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: 21 Dec 2004 09:51:25 +0100
"symbio" <symbio@has.com> writes:
> MACSYMA is free, however it's old.
As far as I know, MACSYMA is still sold commercially. There is a free
version based on oder sources called Maxima. I've only looked at it
briefly. My impression was that in terms of documentation, features,
bug-removal it has quite a while to go before it matches Mathematica
(or Maple).
Maxima might be a very cool project if you want to learn about CAS and
are not afraid of slightly old-style LISP code.
If you are just a CAS _user_ and happy with a slightly out-of-date
software you'll be better off if you _simply_ _don't_ _update_ your
current version of Mathematica. While not as cool as Maxima (Lisp,
source code, long history), it is the more practical solution right
now.
- Next message: W. Dale Hall: "Re: Please help"
- Previous message: Brad Cooper: "Re: Maple bugs: Backward compatibility - 1"
- In reply to: symbio: "Mathematica vs. MACSYMA"
- Next in thread: Albert Reiner: "Re: Mathematica vs. MACSYMA"
- Reply: Albert Reiner: "Re: Mathematica vs. MACSYMA"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|