Re: Simplification: science or heuristics?
carlos_at_colorado.edu
Date: 01/20/05
- Next message: Radu Zapotinschi: "Re: Simplification: science or heuristics?"
- Previous message: carlos_at_colorado.edu: "Re: Simplification: science or heuristics?"
- In reply to: gmatthew_at_amgen.com: "Re: Simplification: science or heuristics?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: 20 Jan 2005 10:43:48 -0800
gmatthew@amgen.com wrote:
> Well the first so called simplification of
>
> 1-x^2
> ----- -> 1 + x
> 1-x
> isn't even correct, since the two expressions have different domains.
This is largely pointless and off topic. In a well designed ES system,
there is a symbol database that returns information on the domain and
range of each symbol, or uses default assumptions such as "symbols
without declared assumptions are assumed to be complex and
unrestricted" Thus x*y-y*x -> 0 is not correct if x and y are members
of a noncommutative ring.
- Next message: Radu Zapotinschi: "Re: Simplification: science or heuristics?"
- Previous message: carlos_at_colorado.edu: "Re: Simplification: science or heuristics?"
- In reply to: gmatthew_at_amgen.com: "Re: Simplification: science or heuristics?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|