Re: 2 maple important bugs, ifactor(10000!);pi(500000000);
From: Richard J. Fateman (fateman_at_eecs.berkeley.edu)
Date: 01/29/05
- Previous message: devore_at_math.udel.edu: "Re: 2 maple important bugs, ifactor(10000!);pi(500000000);"
- In reply to: Bernard Parisse: "Re: 2 maple important bugs, ifactor(10000!);pi(500000000);"
- Next in thread: Bernard Parisse: "OT was Re: 2 maple important bugs, ifactor(10000!);pi(500000000);"
- Reply: Bernard Parisse: "OT was Re: 2 maple important bugs, ifactor(10000!);pi(500000000);"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Fri, 28 Jan 2005 17:06:20 -0800
Bernard Parisse wrote:
> Richard Fateman wrote:
>
>> There are other systems than Maple that
>> concentrate on number theoretic computations and compete
>> to do large number stuff fast. NTL comes to mind.
>> In fact, maybe Maple should call NTL in a similar
>> model to Matlab calling Maple.
>
>
> This is not possible since NTL is GPL-ed (unless the
> license is changed or unless Maple
> becomes licensed under the GPL which I seriously doubt!).
> That's one advantage of GPL-ed CAS, they can link
> to these kind of excellent libraries (like for example
> Giac/Xcas with PARI and NTL).
It seems to me that would make it impossible to run a proprietary
program under linux unless perhaps the program did no
input or output. I assume this is not a great newsgroup
for this discussion, but your email address didn't work.
RJF
- Previous message: devore_at_math.udel.edu: "Re: 2 maple important bugs, ifactor(10000!);pi(500000000);"
- In reply to: Bernard Parisse: "Re: 2 maple important bugs, ifactor(10000!);pi(500000000);"
- Next in thread: Bernard Parisse: "OT was Re: 2 maple important bugs, ifactor(10000!);pi(500000000);"
- Reply: Bernard Parisse: "OT was Re: 2 maple important bugs, ifactor(10000!);pi(500000000);"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|