Re: Computer Algebra Algorithms lisp vs. C.

From: parisse@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Date: Fri, 15 Apr 2005 06:58:52 +0200

Modern FPLs are vastly better suited to CAS development than C++. The
resulting programs will be smaller, simpler, faster, more robust and
efficient than a C++ program written in the same amount of time.


Can you show us some code that support your claim?
.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Computer Algebra Algorithms lisp vs. C.
  - From: Jon Harrop

References:
- Re: Computer Algebra Algorithms
  - From: JohnCreighton_
- Re: Computer Algebra Algorithms
  - From: Bernard Parisse
- Re: Computer Algebra Algorithms lisp vs. C.
  - From: Richard Fateman
- Re: Computer Algebra Algorithms lisp vs. C.
  - From: Bernard Parisse
- Re: Computer Algebra Algorithms lisp vs. C.
  - From: Jon Harrop
- Re: Computer Algebra Algorithms lisp vs. C.
  - From: parisse
- Re: Computer Algebra Algorithms lisp vs. C.
  - From: Richard J. Fateman
- Re: Computer Algebra Algorithms lisp vs. C.
  - From: Jon Harrop

Prev by Date: Re: Computer Algebra Algorithms lisp vs. C.
Next by Date: Re: Computer Algebra Algorithms lisp vs. C.
Previous by thread: Re: Computer Algebra Algorithms lisp vs. C.
Next by thread: Re: Computer Algebra Algorithms lisp vs. C.
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread