greater_than in maple9.5 not expected meaning?
- From: Gaspard Lequeux <gaspard.lequeux_at@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2005 19:34:50 +0200
Hej,
Upgrading some code from maple 8 to maple 9.5, I stumbled on the following
strange behaviour:
I had to change the following:
verify(1,1,greater_than)
to
verify[greater_than](1,1)
because of strange errors when the linalg package was loaded, but already in
maple 8 you have:
> verify(1,1,greater_than);
false
> verify[greater_than](1,1);
true
and in maple 9.5 the same error occurs.
The problem with the linalg package was actually with 'equal', but for
uniformisation...:
> verify(1,1,'equal');
> with(linalg);
Warning, the protected names norm and trace have been redefined and unprotected
[..., equal, ...]
> verify(1,1,'equal');
Error, (in verify) verification ``linalg:-equal`` does not exist
> unwith(linalg);
> verify(1,1,'equal');
true
Of course, I could use one notation for 'equal' and the other one for
greater_than, but for maintainability of the code this is really bad.
Thanks for any explanation,
Gaspard
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: greater_than in maple9.5 not expected meaning?
- From: Alec Mihailovs
- Re: greater_than in maple9.5 not expected meaning?
- Prev by Date: Re: Computer Algebra Algorithms lisp vs. C.
- Next by Date: Re: Computer Algebra Algorithms lisp vs. C.
- Previous by thread: TI-89 error
- Next by thread: Re: greater_than in maple9.5 not expected meaning?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|
