Re: Introducing CAS To Engineers (was Mathamatica vs MATLAB)
- From: t.richard@xxxxxxxxxxxxx (Thomas Richard)
- Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2005 19:30:05 GMT
JohnCreighton_@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> [...]
> So in MATLAB 7 it does something intelligent a reasonable amount of the
> time. It is not able to recognize every commonly used irrational
> number. For instance it was not able to get back the symbolic
> expression 1+e from the its associated double value.
As an aside: if that's what you expect, you're probably better off with
Maple and its 'identify' command, available from Maple 9 on.
--
Thomas Richard
Maple Support
Scientific Computers GmbH
http://www.scientific.de
.
- References:
- Introducing CAS To Engineers (was Mathamatica vs MATLAB)
- From: JohnCreighton_
- Re: Introducing CAS To Engineers (was Mathamatica vs MATLAB)
- From: Richard J. Fateman
- Re: Introducing CAS To Engineers (was Mathamatica vs MATLAB)
- From: Jerzy Karczmarczuk
- Re: Introducing CAS To Engineers (was Mathamatica vs MATLAB)
- From: Richard Fateman
- Re: Introducing CAS To Engineers (was Mathamatica vs MATLAB)
- From: JohnCreighton_
- Introducing CAS To Engineers (was Mathamatica vs MATLAB)
- Prev by Date: Re: Introducing CAS To Engineers
- Next by Date: Re: Introducing CAS To Engineers (was Mathamatica vs MATLAB)
- Previous by thread: Re: Introducing CAS To Engineers (was Mathamatica vs MATLAB)
- Next by thread: Re: Introducing CAS To Engineers (was Mathamatica vs MATLAB)
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|