sci.math.symbolic
- Re: Improving the MATLAB function "simple" / genetic not a good idea, Richard J. Fateman
- couple of questions on using the new interface, maple 10, Nasser Abbasi
- Maple and Mathematica, substitution of expressions. interesting case, opposite behaviour,
Nasser Abbasi
- Re: Maple and Mathematica, substitution of expressions. interesting case, opposite behaviour, Dana
- Re: Maple and Mathematica, substitution of expressions. interesting case, opposite behaviour, Robert Israel
- Re: Maple and Mathematica, substitution of expressions. interesting case, opposite behaviour, JohnCreighton_
- Re: Maple and Mathematica, substitution of expressions.,
Richard Fateman
- Re: Maple and Mathematica, substitution of expressions., Thomas Richard
- gettng values of solved equation in mupad,
Marten
- Re: gettng values of solved equation in mupad, Walter Oevel
- Bugfix for wxMaxima 0.6.1, Peter Pein
- Solving a function of two exponentials,
obrian7
- Re: Solving a function of two exponentials,
David W . Cantrell
- Re: Solving a function of two exponentials,
JohnCreighton_
- Re: Solving a function of two exponentials, Robert Israel
- Re: Solving a function of two exponentials,
JohnCreighton_
- Re: Solving a function of two exponentials, JohnCreighton_
- Re: Solving a function of two exponentials, bassam king karzeddin
- Re: Solving a function of two exponentials,
David W . Cantrell
- Volterra integral equation of the first kind,
James Briscoe
- Re: Volterra integral equation of the first kind, Julian V. Noble
- Is Maxima available for OS X?,
Thomas Madden
- Re: Is Maxima available for OS X?,
Dave Seaman
- Re: Is Maxima available for OS X?,
Thomas Madden
- Re: Is Maxima available for OS X?, Dave Seaman
- Re: Is Maxima available for OS X?, Thomas Madden
- Re: Is Maxima available for OS X?, Dave Seaman
- Re: Is Maxima available for OS X?, Raymond Manzoni
- Re: Is Maxima available for OS X?, Dave Seaman
- Re: Is Maxima available for OS X?, Raymond Manzoni
- Re: Is Maxima available for OS X?, Dave Seaman
- Re: Is Maxima available for OS X?, Raymond Manzoni
- Re: Is Maxima available for OS X?, Piet van Oostrum
- Re: Is Maxima available for OS X?, Raymond Manzoni
- Re: Is Maxima available for OS X?, Albert Reiner
- Re: Is Maxima available for OS X?, Dave Seaman
- Re: Is Maxima available for OS X?, Albert Reiner
- Re: Is Maxima available for OS X?,
Thomas Madden
- Re: Is Maxima available for OS X?,
Dave Seaman
- Grober basis simplification?,
Ronald Bruck
- Re: Grober basis simplification?, devore
- Re: Grober basis simplification?, Joe Riel
- Groebner Base computation needed,
Jürgen Böhm
- Re: Groebner Base computation needed,
Jürgen Böhm
- Re: Groebner Base computation needed,
Jürgen Böhm
- Re: Groebner Base computation needed, Roman Pearce
- Re: Groebner Base computation needed,
Jürgen Böhm
- Re: Groebner Base computation needed,
Jürgen Böhm
- comparison of Mathcad, Mupad and Mathematica, Allan W. Bart, Jr.
- Useful Root Finding Method?, JohnCreighton_
- why invent another CAS,
Baloff
- Re: why invent another CAS,
JohnCreighton_
- Re: why invent another CAS,
Richard J. Fateman
- Re: why invent another CAS, Baloff
- Re: why invent another CAS, Martin Rubey
- Re: why invent another CAS, parisse
- Re: why invent another CAS,
Felix Rawlings
- Re: why invent another CAS, JohnCreighton_
- Re: why invent another CAS,
Richard J. Fateman
- Re: why invent another CAS, A . L .
- Re: why invent another CAS,
JohnCreighton_
- Re: why invent another CAS,
Nasser Abbasi
- Re: why invent another CAS, Richard Fateman
- Re: why invent another CAS, Joe Riel
- Type 1 vs Type 3 fonts in Mma review. was: Re: why invent another CAS, Richard J. Fateman
- Re: Type 1 vs Type 3 fonts in Mma review. was: Re: why invent another CAS, Nasser Abbasi
- other reviews of CAS, Richard Fateman
- Re: why invent another CAS, Jean-Michel Collard
- Re: why invent another CAS, Peter Pein
- Re: why invent another CAS,
Nasser Abbasi
- Re: why invent another CAS,
JohnCreighton_
- Using Mupad for commercial applications,
Allan W. Bart, Jr.
- Re: Using Mupad for commercial applications,
Christopher Creutzig
- Re: Using Mupad for commercial applications, Nasser Abbasi
- Re: Using Mupad for commercial applications,
Christopher Creutzig
- Re: Mupad: Plot problem "Can't evaluate to boolean", Walter Oevel
- perturbative analysis of nonlinear 1st order ODE, Tom Chou
- maxima asking a wrong question?,
Baloff
- Re: maxima asking a wrong question?, Leo Harten
- Re: maxima asking a wrong question?,
Dave Rusin
- Re: maxima asking a wrong question?,
Baloff
- Re: maxima asking a wrong question?, JohnCreighton_
- Re: maxima asking a wrong question?, JohnCreighton_
- Re: maxima asking a wrong question?, Leo Harten
- Re: maxima asking a wrong question?,
Baloff
- Re: Simplifying radicals,
JohnCreighton_
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Simplifying radicals, Albert Reiner
- Re: Simplifying radicals, JohnCreighton_
- Re: Simplifying radicals,
Peter L. Montgomery
- Re: Simplifying radicals,
Christopher Creutzig
- Re: Simplifying radicals, Richard J. Fateman
- Re: Simplifying radicals,
Christopher Creutzig
- MuPad 3.1 why no substitution?,
Brad Cooper
- Re: MuPad 3.1 why no substitution?, Walter Oevel
- mss-harmonics,
adam majewski
- Re: mss-harmonics, adam majewski
- volume under the surface,
Baloff
- Re: volume under the surface, JohnCreighton_
- Re: volume under the surface,
Baloff
- Re: volume under the surface,
devore
- Re: volume under the surface, Baloff
- Re: volume under the surface,
devore
- a small observation on Mathematica Dimensions[]. Compare to Matlab, Nasser Abbasi
- Re: functional style compared to procedural style and comments on a Mathematica function I saw.,
Nasser Abbasi
- Re: functional style compared to procedural style and comments on a Mathematica function I saw., Nasser Abbasi
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: functional style compared to procedural style and comments on a Mathematica function I saw.,
Jon McLoone
- Re: functional style compared to procedural style and comments on a Mathematica function I saw.,
Nasser Abbasi
- Re: functional style compared to procedural style and comments on a Mathematica function I saw., Jon Harrop
- Re: functional style compared to procedural style and comments on a Mathematica function I saw., Richard J. Fateman
- Re: functional style compared to procedural style and comments on a Mathematica function I saw., Jon Harrop
- Re: functional style compared to procedural style and comments on a Mathematica function I saw., Richard J. Fateman
- Re: functional style compared to procedural style and comments on a Mathematica function I saw., Paul Abbott
- Re: functional style compared to procedural style and comments on a Mathematica function I saw., Richard Fateman
- Re: functional style compared to procedural style and comments on a Mathematica function I saw., Paul Abbott
- Re: functional style compared to procedural style and comments on a Mathematica function I saw., Maxim
- Re: functional style compared to procedural style and comments on a Mathematica function I saw., Jon Harrop
- Re: functional style compared to procedural style and comments on a Mathematica function I saw., Jens Axel Søgaard
- Re: functional style compared to procedural style and comments on a Mathematica function I saw., Jon Harrop
- Re: functional style compared to procedural style and comments on a Mathematica function I saw., Richard Fateman
- Re: functional style compared to procedural style and comments on a Mathematica function I saw., Raymond Toy
- Re: functional style compared to procedural style and comments on a Mathematica function I saw., Richard Fateman
- Re: functional style compared to procedural style and comments on a Mathematica function I saw., Jon Harrop
- Re: functional style compared to procedural style and comments on a Mathematica function I saw., Richard J. Fateman
- Re: functional style compared to procedural style and comments on a Mathematica function I saw., Jon Harrop
- Re: functional style compared to procedural style and comments on a Mathematica function I saw., Jon Harrop
- Re: functional style compared to procedural style and comments on a Mathematica function I saw., Richard Fateman
- Re: functional style compared to procedural style and comments on a Mathematica function I saw., Jon Harrop
- Re: functional style compared to procedural style and comments on a Mathematica function I saw., Richard Fateman
- Re: functional style compared to procedural style and comments on a Mathematica function I saw., Jon Harrop
- Re: functional style compared to procedural style and comments on a Mathematica function I saw., Nasser Abbasi
- Re: functional style compared to procedural style and comments on a Mathematica function I saw., Nasser Abbasi
- Re: functional style compared to procedural style and comments on a Mathematica function I saw.,
Nasser Abbasi
- On Manuel Bronstein, J.Barsuhn
- Tchirnhaus transformation,
Kent Holing
- Re: Tchirnhaus transformation, carlos
- limits of integration,
Baloff
- Re: limits of integration,
Leo Harten
- Re: limits of integration, Peter Pein
- Re: limits of integration, Leo Harten
- Re: limits of integration,
Martin Rubey
- Re: limits of integration, Baloff
- Re: limits of integration,
Leo Harten
- Version 5.5 of Scientific Word, Scientific WorkPlace & Scientific Notebook, Christopher Mabb
- symbolic algebra,
Baloff
- Re: symbolic algebra,
Richard Fateman
- Re: symbolic algebra,
Baloff
- Re: symbolic algebra, A N Niel
- Re: symbolic algebra, Baloff
- Re: symbolic algebra, A N Niel
- Re: symbolic algebra, Richard J. Fateman
- Re: symbolic algebra, Baloff
- Re: symbolic algebra, Dana
- Re: symbolic algebra, Philo D
- Re: symbolic algebra, Baloff
- Re: symbolic algebra, Richard Fateman
- Re: symbolic algebra, Richard Fateman
- Re: symbolic algebra,
Baloff
- Re: symbolic algebra,
Richard Fateman
- Coq + OCAML = Symbolic abstract math programs?,
craigugoretz@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: Coq + OCAML = Symbolic abstract math programs?,
Richard J. Fateman
- Re: Coq + OCAML = Symbolic abstract math programs?, craigugoretz@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: Coq + OCAML = Symbolic abstract math programs?,
Richard J. Fateman
- Sturm's theorem,
Kent Holing
- Re: Sturm's theorem,
devore
- Re: Sturm's theorem, Elias P. TSIGARIDAS
- Re: Sturm's theorem,
devore
- Maple 10: Integration over a variable of type 'real', Ralph Trenkler
- Simplified solution of cubic equation,
samdavidwaller
- Re: Simplified solution of cubic equation,
Stein Arild Strømme
- Re: Simplified solution of cubic equation, Dave Rusin
- Message not available
- Re: Simplified solution of cubic equation, samdavidwaller
- Re: Simplified solution of cubic equation,
Jeremy Watts
- Re: Simplified solution of cubic equation,
samdavidwaller
- Re: Simplified solution of cubic equation, Jeremy Watts
- Message not available
- Re: Simplified solution of cubic equation, carlos
- Re: Simplified solution of cubic equation, Paul Abbott
- Message not available
- Re: Simplified solution of cubic equation, Jens Axel Søgaard
- Re: Simplified solution of cubic equation,
samdavidwaller
- Re: Simplified solution of cubic equation,
Stein Arild Strømme
- Re: Simplified solution of cubic equation, Peter L. Montgomery
- Re: Simplified solution of cubic equation,
Elias P. TSIGARIDAS
- Re: Simplified solution of cubic equation, samdavidwaller
- Re: Simplified solution of cubic equation, samdavidwaller
- Re: Simplified solution of cubic equation, Dave Rusin
- Re: Simplified solution of cubic equation, Elias P. TSIGARIDAS
- Re: Simplified solution of cubic equation, samdavidwaller
- Re: Simplified solution of cubic equation / other implicit answers, Richard Fateman
- Re: Simplified solution of cubic equation / other implicit answers, David W . Cantrell
- Re: Simplified solution of cubic equation, carlos
- Re: Simplified solution of cubic equation, samdavidwaller
- Re: Algorithm to generate permutations, Richard Fateman
- Re: system of nonlinear equations, Richard Fateman
- Re: system of nonlinear equations, Jeremy Watts
- Re: system of nonlinear equations,
Thomas Richard
- Re: system of nonlinear equations,
semiconductor
- Re: system of nonlinear equations, Thomas Richard
- Re: system of nonlinear equations, Peter L. Montgomery
- Re: system of nonlinear equations, semiconductor
- Re: system of nonlinear equations,
semiconductor
- Re: system of nonlinear equations, semiconductor
- Re: system of nonlinear equations,
Robert H. Lewis
- Re: system of nonlinear equations, Roman Pearce
- Re: equality question, A N Niel
- Re: QR decomposition with row pivoting, Helmut Jarausch
- Re: Output of Galois Field elements in MuPAD?, Christopher Creutzig
- Re: My progress on expression simplifier, Richard Fateman
Loading