Re: ArcTanh[x,y] & Wikipedia.
- From: "David N. Williams" <david.n.williams@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2005 14:03:26 -0400
Richard J. Fateman wrote:
Macsyma / Maxima uses asin and asinh (etc.) [...]
Actually the language I use most (Forth) also uses asin and asinh, for example, in the form fasinh and zasinh, for the real and complex floating point functions.
I would not expect the openmath standard to be held up as an example to be followed; rather the openmath people seem to try to follow someone else's standard. e.g. what does "cos" mean? Well, what it usually means.
Well, "what it usually means" isn't so clear for the complex inverse functions. :-) I believe you're an expert in this general area. I think having a standard helps here, and I have bought into the openmath version, which I understand to be the same as Kahan's. Is it the same as Macsyma/Maxima?
-- David .
- References:
- ArcTanh[x,y] & Wikipedia.
- From: Roger Beresford
- Re: ArcTanh[x,y] & Wikipedia.
- From: Simo K Kivelä
- Re: ArcTanh[x,y] & Wikipedia.
- From: David N. Williams
- Re: ArcTanh[x,y] & Wikipedia.
- From: Richard J. Fateman
- ArcTanh[x,y] & Wikipedia.
- Prev by Date: Re: ArcTanh[x,y] & Wikipedia.
- Next by Date: Why doesn't Mathematica simplify this LaplaceTransform property?
- Previous by thread: Re: ArcTanh[x,y] & Wikipedia.
- Next by thread: Re: ArcTanh[x,y] & Wikipedia.
- Index(es):
Loading