Re: factoring higher degree questions
- From: Richard Fateman <fateman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 30 Oct 2005 15:31:24 GMT
BemusedbyQM wrote:
"Richard Fateman" <fateman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message news:GVT8f.6894$BZ5.2668@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
BemusedbyQM wrote:
actually in response to the OP, i seem to remember that the symbolic factorisation (or -ization...) ...
<snip, a bunch of incorrect suggestions>
Before posting to sci.math.symbolic, figure that whatever ignorance you display will be archived forever. So maybe you should check your facts first.
A more specific response was sent to the "return" email, but that seems to be bogus. RJF
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: factoring higher degree questions
- From: BemusedbyQM
- Re: factoring higher degree questions
- References:
- factoring higher degree questions
- From: russiandon
- Re: factoring higher degree questions
- From: BemusedbyQM
- Re: factoring higher degree questions
- From: JohnCreighton_
- Re: factoring higher degree questions
- From: BemusedbyQM
- Re: factoring higher degree questions
- From: Richard Fateman
- Re: factoring higher degree questions
- From: BemusedbyQM
- Re: factoring higher degree questions
- From: Richard Fateman
- Re: factoring higher degree questions
- From: BemusedbyQM
- factoring higher degree questions
- Prev by Date: Re: Is MuPAD Light no longer available?
- Next by Date: Re: MAXIMA on WINDOWS XP
- Previous by thread: Re: factoring higher degree questions
- Next by thread: Re: factoring higher degree questions
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading