Re: factoring higher degree questions


"Richard Fateman" <fateman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:4366413B.9070708@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> BemusedbyQM wrote:
>
> > "Richard Fateman" <fateman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> > news:gH59f.6964$BZ5.1702@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >
> >>BemusedbyQM wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>>"Richard Fateman" <fateman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> >>>news:GVT8f.6894$BZ5.2668@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>>BemusedbyQM wrote:
> >>>>
> >>
> >>>actually in response to the OP, i seem to remember that the symbolic
> >>>factorisation (or -ization...) ...
> >>
> >> <snip, a bunch of incorrect suggestions>
> >>
> >>
> >>Before posting to sci.math.symbolic, figure that whatever ignorance
> >>you display will be archived forever. So maybe you should check
> >>your facts first.
> >
> >
> > the only ignorance displayed forever is yours - shown by your arrogant
and
> > unhelpful attitude. all you have told the OP is to use google and look
up
> > 'polynomial factorization' , so he needed help from a NG to know that?
> >
> No, the advice to use Google was to you. Then you would find some survey
> articles with links, e.g.
> http://mathworld.wolfram.com/PolynomialFactorization.html
>
> The advice to the original poster was to take his homework to "Dr. Math".
> since Russiandon only needed to factor quadratic polynomials.

the only posting i have seen was the OPs vaguely asking how to factorise
higher degree polynomials - i dont remember him asking about quadratics, the
factorisation of which is simple

>
>
> > my original suggestion given by the numerical approach is correct,
>
> In particular are you then claiming you could factor this polynomial
> by finding its roots with a numerical
> approach: a^2+2*a*b+b^2 ? This was one of the original examples.
> Shuhong Gao has made some progress in this area recently, but I doubt you
> are referring to his work.

obviously not if you have symbolic co-efficients - again i dont remember
reading that the OPs problem had symbolic co-efficients
>
>
> as for
> > the symbolic approach using ECM, I could well be wrong as i havent done
> > number theory for many years, i just said it as an after thought.
>
>
> >
> > i dont want any of your emails please, so dont send any to my email
address
> > as junk mail is automatically filtered out...
> >
> That's not the message I got from your service provider. It says the
> account name does not exist.


i couldnt care less what it said

> >
> >>A more specific response was sent to the "return" email, but that
> >>seems to be bogus.
> >>RJF
> >>
> >
> >
> >


.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: factoring higher degree questions
    ... Before posting to sci.math.symbolic, figure that whatever ignorance ... you display will be archived forever. ... your facts first. ...
    (sci.math.symbolic)
  • Re: too much politics
    ... > Your ignorance on the nomenclature is not my problem nor my fault. ... I should start counting your insults. ... Mind you, I am giving you the benefit of doubt ... and you dont know it? ...
    (sci.physics)
  • Re: Fuzzy Still Pictures
    ... "Dont use DV AVI since it distorts pixels to non-square size." ... Isn't pixel aspect specific to the display device, ...
    (microsoft.public.windowsxp.moviemaker)
  • Re: Rebirthing in Wyoming
    ... Why dont you just admit that you have been wrong and move on. ... to fain ignorance and act as if you do not fence sit while other ... sigh a permit for AGOTT. ...
    (alt.gathering.rainbow)
  • Re: RTF or DOC from db to html page - how?
    ... Then apparently I dont know how they entered the data (Supposedly they ... I think I have the formatting info in the text. ... Is there a way to display this on my aspx web page in a clean manner ... Not only that but you cannot display other than text in a aspx, ...
    (microsoft.public.dotnet.languages.csharp)