sci.math.symbolic

• Thread Index

---

• cmaple 9.5: efficient implicitplot3d calls
  • From: c . rowat
• Hochschild cohomology
  • From: nacerix
• Re: Maple : column rank
  • From: Alec Mihailovs
• Re: Maple : column rank
  • From: Joe Riel
• Re: LLL algorithm for factoring polynomials
  • From: Daniel Lichtblau
• Re: Maple : column rank
  • From: Robert Israel
• Re: cos(PI/N)
  • From: JohnCreighton_
• Re: cos(PI/N)
  • From: JohnCreighton_
• Re: cos(PI/N)
  • From: Klueless
• Re: Maple : column rank
  • From: Joe Riel
• Re: Maple : column rank
  • From: David L. Johnson
• Re: Maple : column rank
  • From: Joe Riel
• Re: Maple : column rank
  • From: Robert Israel
• Maple : column rank
  • From: matrix
• Re: cos(PI/N)
  • From: ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZz
• Re: cos(PI/N)
  • From: Klueless
• Re: cos(PI/N)
  • From: ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZz
• Re: cos(PI/N)
  • From: JohnCreighton_
• Re: LLL algorithm for factoring polynomials
  • From: Richard Fateman
• Re: LLL algorithm for factoring polynomials
  • From: JohnCreighton_
• Re: cos(PI/N)
  • From: Jean-Marc Gulliet
• cos(PI/N)
  • From: ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZz
• LLL algorithm for factoring polynomials
  • From: ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZz
• يا جماعة فى منـح تعليميـة مجانية فى مجال برمجة الكمبيوتر
  • From: Dr_mohamed_hassan_103@xxxxxxxxx
• يا جماعة فى منـح تعليميـة مجانية فى مجال برمجة الكمبيوتر
  • From: Dr_mohamed_hassan_103@xxxxxxxxx
• LL(k) grammars for tests
  • From: Michał Śliwka
• Re: when did lim(sin(x),x->inf) become interval [-1,1]?
  • From: Alec Mihailovs
• Re: when did lim(sin(x),x->inf) become interval [-1,1]?
  • From: Richard Fateman
• Re: when did lim(sin(x),x->inf) become interval [-1,1]?
  • From: Alec Mihailovs
• Re: when did lim(sin(x),x->inf) become interval [-1,1]?
  • From: Robert H. Lewis
• Re: Pattern Matching and Transform Rules
  • From: Thomas Richard
• Re: Pattern Matching and Transform Rules
  • From: Richard Fateman
• Re: Pattern Matching and Transform Rules
  • From: carlos
• Re: Pattern Matching and Transform Rules
  • From: Richard Fateman
• Re: Pattern Matching and Transform Rules
  • From: carlos
• Re: Pattern Matching and Transform Rules
  • From: carlos
• Re: Pattern Matching and Transform Rules
  • From: carlos
• Re: Pattern Matching and Transform Rules
  • From: carlos
• Re: when did lim(sin(x),x->inf) become interval [-1,1]?
  • From: Richard Fateman
• Re: Pattern Matching and Transform Rules
  • From: Alec Mihailovs
• Re: when did lim(sin(x),x->inf) become interval [-1,1]?
  • From: Alec Mihailovs
• Re: when did lim(sin(x),x->inf) become interval [-1,1]?
  • From: Maths For Fun And Insight
• Re: Pattern Matching and Transform Rules
  • From: carlos
• Re: A(n orthogonal) set of essential operations for CAS
  • From: Richard Fateman
• Re: Pattern Matching and Transform Rules
  • From: Dr Jon D Harrop
• Re: Pattern Matching and Transform Rules
  • From: Dr Jon D Harrop
• Re: A(n orthogonal) set of essential operations for CAS
  • From: Dr Jon D Harrop
• Re: Pattern Matching and Transform Rules / parens everywhere?
  • From: Richard Fateman
• Re: Pattern Matching and Transform Rules / parens everywhere?
  • From: Rupert Swarbrick
• Re: when did lim(sin(x),x->inf) become interval [-1,1]?
  • From: Joel Storch
• Re: when did lim(sin(x),x->inf) become interval [-1,1]?
  • From: Richard Fateman
• Re: when did lim(sin(x),x->inf) become interval [-1,1]?
  • From: Rouben Rostamian
• Re: when did lim(sin(x),x->inf) become interval [-1,1]?
  • From: Daniel Lichtblau
• Re: when did lim(sin(x),x->inf) become interval [-1,1]?
  • From: Jean-Marc Gulliet
• Re: when did lim(sin(x),x->inf) become interval [-1,1]?
  • From: Christopher Creutzig
• Re: when did lim(sin(x),x->inf) become interval [-1,1]?
  • From: Robert Israel
• Re: when did lim(sin(x),x->inf) become interval [-1,1]?
  • From: Alec Mihailovs
• Re: when did lim(sin(x),x->inf) become interval [-1,1]?
  • From: Alec Mihailovs
• Re: when did lim(sin(x),x->inf) become interval [-1,1]?
  • From: Joe Riel
• when did lim(sin(x),x->inf) become interval [-1,1]?
  • From: Richard Fateman
• Re: Pattern Matching and Transform Rules / parens everywhere?
  • From: Richard Fateman
• Re: Pattern Matching and Transform Rules
  • From: Richard Fateman
• Re: Pattern Matching and Transform Rules
  • From: Albert Reiner
• Re: c or c++ library for symbolic computation
  • From: Robert Dodier
• Re: c or c++ library for symbolic computation
  • From: Roman Pearce
• Re: c or c++ library for symbolic computation
  • From: Robert Dodier
• Re: c or c++ library for symbolic computation
  • From: Marc Dansereau
• Re: Pattern Matching and Transform Rules 1/b^2 has no b^2 in it?
  • From: Alec Mihailovs
• Re: Pattern Matching and Transform Rules 1/b^2 has no b^2 in it?
  • From: carlos
• Re: Pattern Matching and Transform Rules 1/b^2 has no b^2 in it?
  • From: Alec Mihailovs
• Re: Pattern Matching and Transform Rules 1/b^2 has no b^2 in it?
  • From: carlos
• Re: c or c++ library for symbolic computation
  • From: Roman Pearce
• Re: Pattern Matching and Transform Rules 1/b^2 has no b^2 in it?
  • From: Richard Fateman
• Re: Pattern Matching and Transform Rules
  • From: Richard Fateman
• Re: Pattern Matching and Transform Rules
  • From: carlos
• Re: Pattern Matching and Transform Rules
  • From: Peter Pein
• Re: Pattern Matching and Transform Rules
  • From: Peter Pein
• Re: c or c++ library for symbolic computation
  • From: Bernard Parisse
• c or c++ library for symbolic computation
  • From: Marc Dansereau
• Re: Pattern Matching and Transform Rules
  • From: carlos
• Re: Pattern Matching and Transform Rules
  • From: Albert Reiner
• Re: Pattern Matching and Transform Rules
  • From: carlos
• Re: Pattern Matching and Transform Rules
  • From: Richard Fateman
• Re: Pattern Matching and Transform Rules
  • From: Jean-Marc Gulliet
• Re: Pattern Matching and Transform Rules
  • From: Alec Mihailovs
• Re: Pattern Matching and Transform Rules
  • From: carlos
• Re: Pattern Matching and Transform Rules
  • From: Paul Abbott
• Re: Pattern Matching and Transform Rules
  • From: Alec Mihailovs
• Re: interest calculation in MMA
  • From: sean_incali
• interest calculation in MMA
  • From: sean_incali
• Re: A(n orthogonal) set of essential operations for CAS
  • From: D Herring
• Re: Maple Vs Mathematica debugging
  • From: Paul Abbott
• Re: Symbolic Math as Computer Science
  • From: Paul Abbott
• Re: A(n orthogonal) set of essential operations for CAS
  • From: Jens Axel Søgaard
• Re: A(n orthogonal) set of essential operations for CAS
  • From: Hatto von Aquitanien
• Re: analytic prolongation
  • From: Tamara Diaz
• Solving solvable septics
  • From: M.A.Fajjal
• Re: Mathematica - integral exist?
  • From: mi|ia
• Re: Mathematica - integral exist?
  • From: mi|ia
• Re: complexity of numerical software
  • From: Christopher Creutzig
• Re: A(n orthogonal) set of essential operations for CAS
  • From: Richard J. Fateman
• Re: analytic prolongation
  • From: Peter Pein
• Re: analytic prolongation
  • From: Chip Eastham
• Re: A(n orthogonal) set of essential operations for CAS
  • From: Hatto von Aquitanien
• analytic prolongation
  • From: Tamara Diaz
• Re: A(n orthogonal) set of essential operations for CAS
  • From: Robert Dodier
• Re: Wanted: Free symbolic/numerical ODE environment
  • From: JohnCreighton_
• Re: A(n orthogonal) set of essential operations for CAS
  • From: Albert Reiner
• A(n orthogonal) set of essential operations for CAS
  • From: Hatto von Aquitanien
• Re: Maple Vs Mathematica debugging / cost to write a system
  • From: Richard Fateman
• Re: Wanted: Free symbolic/numerical ODE environment
  • From: Martin Rubey
• Re: Symbolic Math as Computer Science
  • From: Martin Rubey
• Re: MathML as a symbolic math language
  • From: Hatto von Aquitanien
• Re: Maple Vs Mathematica debugging / cost to write a system
  • From: Caerwyn Esgydiad
• Re: Definite Integration
  • From: Sayed
• Re: Wanted: Free symbolic/numerical ODE environment
  • From: JohnCreighton_
• Wanted: Free symbolic/numerical ODE environment
  • From: D Herring
• Re: MathML as a symbolic math language
  • From: Richard Fateman
• Re: MathML as a symbolic math language
  • From: israel
• Re: MathML as a symbolic math language
  • From: Hatto von Aquitanien
• Re: MathML as a symbolic math language
  • From: Richard Fateman
• Re: MathML as a symbolic math language
  • From: Hatto von Aquitanien
• Re: Symbolic Math as Computer Science
  • From: Nasser Abbasi
• Re: MathML as a symbolic math language
  • From: Robert Dodier
• Re: Call for Papers (Refereed): Maple Conference 2006
  • From: paul v birke
• Re: Call for Papers (Refereed): Maple Conference 2006
  • From: paul v birke
• Re: Call for Papers (Refereed): Maple Conference 2006
  • From: paul v birke
• Re: MathML as a symbolic math language
  • From: Robert Israel
• Re: MathML as a symbolic math language
  • From: Chip Eastham
• Re: complexity of numerical software
  • From: Jaap Spies
• Re: Symbolic Math as Computer Science
  • From: Martin Rubey
• Re: complexity of numerical software
  • From: Jean-Claude Arbaut
• Re: complexity of numerical software(2)
  • From: Jaap Spies
• Re: Symbolic Math as Computer Science
  • From: Hatto von Aquitanien
• Re: complexity of numerical software(2)
  • From: Nasser Abbasi
• Re: complexity of numerical software
  • From: Jaap Spies
• Re: complexity of numerical software
  • From: Jean-Claude Arbaut
• Re: complexity of numerical software
  • From: David N. Williams
• Re: complexity of numerical software(2)
  • From: Jaap Spies
• MathML as a symbolic math language
  • From: Hatto von Aquitanien
• Re: Symbolic Math as Computer Science
  • From: Richard J. Fateman
• Re: complexity of numerical software(2)
  • From: Richard Fateman
• Re: complexity of numerical software
  • From: Jean-Claude Arbaut
• Re: Symbolic Math as Computer Science
  • From: Hatto von Aquitanien
• Re: Maple Vs Mathematica debugging / cost to write a system
  • From: Ronald Bruck
• complexity of numerical software(2)
  • From: Jaap Spies
• Re: complexity of numerical software
  • From: Jaap Spies
• Re: complexity of numerical software
  • From: Jean-Claude Arbaut
• Re: Maple Vs Mathematica debugging / cost to write a system
  • From: Jean-Claude Arbaut
• complexity of numerical software
  • From: Jaap Spies
• Re: Maple Vs Mathematica debugging / cost to write a system
  • From: carlos
• Re: Maple Vs Mathematica debugging / cost to write a system
  • From: Jaap Spies
• Re: Maple Vs Mathematica debugging / cost to write a system
  • From: carlos
• Re: Maple Vs Mathematica debugging / cost to write a system
  • From: Colin Rose
• Re: Maple Vs Mathematica debugging / cost to write a system
  • From: David N. Williams
• Re: Maple Vs Mathematica debugging / cost to write a system
  • From: carlos
• Numerical software easy to write?
  • From: Richard Fateman
• Re: Maple Vs Mathematica debugging / cost to write a system
  • From: Dana DeLouis
• Re: Maple Vs Mathematica debugging / cost to write a system
  • From: Nasser Abbasi
• Re: Maple Vs Mathematica debugging / cost to write a system
  • From: carlos
• Re: cost to write a system / SAGE
  • From: Jaap Spies
• Re: Maple Vs Mathematica debugging / cost to write a system
  • From: Nasser Abbasi
• Re: Maple Vs Mathematica debugging / cost to write a system
  • From: Martin Rubey
• Re: Maple Vs Mathematica debugging / cost to write a system
  • From: Dave
• Re: Maple Vs Mathematica debugging / cost to write a system
  • From: Martin Rubey
• Re: Maple Vs Mathematica debugging / cost to write a system
  • From: Robert Israel
• Re: Maple Vs Mathematica debugging / cost to write a system
  • From: Jean-Claude Arbaut
• Re: Maple Vs Mathematica debugging / cost to write a system
  • From: Dave
• Re: Maple Vs Mathematica debugging / cost to write a system
  • From: parisse
• Re: Maple Vs Mathematica debugging / cost to write a system
  • From: Richard Fateman
• Re: Maple Vs Mathematica debugging
  • From: John Francis
• Re: Maple Vs Mathematica debugging / cost to write a system
  • From: Dave
• Re: Maple Vs Mathematica debugging / cost to write a system
  • From: Richard Fateman
• Re: Maple Vs Mathematica debugging / cost to write a system
  • From: Dave
• Re: cost to write a system / SAGE
  • From: Dave Rusin
• Re: differential calculus
  • From: Vladimir Bondarenko
• Re: differential calculus
  • From: Richard Fateman
• Re: cost to write a system / SAGE
  • From: Richard Fateman
• Re: Maple Vs Mathematica debugging / cost to write a system
  • From: Jaap Spies
• Re: Maple Vs Mathematica debugging / cost to write a system
  • From: Richard J. Fateman
• Re: differential calculus
  • From: JohnCreighton_
• Re: Maple Vs Mathematica debugging
  • From: Nasser Abbasi
• Re: Maple Vs Mathematica debugging
  • From: parisse
• Access control on webMathematica
  • From: Dave
• Re: Maple Vs Mathematica debugging
  • From: Dana
• Re: differential calculus
  • From: Nasser Abbasi
• Re: Maple Vs Mathematica debugging
  • From: Nasser Abbasi
• Re: Complex variable
  • From: Caerwyn Esgydiad
• Re: Complex variable
  • From: Julian V. Noble
• Re: Maple Vs Mathematica debugging
  • From: Alec Mihailovs
• Re: Complex variable
  • From: Dave Seaman
• Re: Complex variable
  • From: Caerwyn Esgydiad
• Re: Galoys Theory
  • From: Peter Pein
• Re: Maple Vs Mathematica debugging
  • From: Peter Pein
• Re: Question about Maple (a color problem)
  • From: anthony
• Re: Complex variable
  • From: Robert Israel
• Re: Maple Vs Mathematica debugging
  • From: Jaap Spies
• Re: Maple Vs Mathematica debugging
  • From: Alasdair McAndrew
• Re: Maple Vs Mathematica debugging
  • From: carlos
• Re: Maple Vs Mathematica debugging
  • From: Jaap Spies
• Re: Maple Vs Mathematica debugging
  • From: carlos
• Re: Complex variable
  • From: Dave
• Re: Maple Vs Mathematica debugging
  • From: Alec Mihailovs
• Re: Maple Vs Mathematica : How much of the source code?
  • From: carlos
• Re: Maple Vs Mathematica debugging
  • From: Richard J. Fateman
• Re: Question about Maple (a color problem)
  • From: Alec Mihailovs
• Re: Maple Vs Mathematica : How much of the source code?
  • From: Nasser Abbasi
• Re: Complex variable
  • From: Julian V. Noble
• Re: Maple Vs Mathematica : How much of the source code?
  • From: carlos
• Re: Question about Maple (a color problem)
  • From: anthony
• Re: Question about Maple (a color problem)
  • From: anthony
• Re: Question about Maple (a color problem)
  • From: israel
• Re: Complex variable
  • From: Dave Seaman
• Re: Complex variable
  • From: Jens Axel Søgaard
• Re: Complex variable
  • From: Caerwyn Esgydiad
• Re: Question about Maple (a color problem)
  • From: anthony
• Re: Question about Maple (a color problem)
  • From: Alec Mihailovs
• Re: Maple Vs Mathematica : How much of the source code?
  • From: Richard Fateman
• Re: Question about Maple (a color problem)
  • From: anthony
• Re: Question about Maple (a color problem)
  • From: Alec Mihailovs
• Re: Galoys Theory
  • From: Richard Fateman
• Re: Complex variable
  • From: Dave Seaman
• Re: Galoys Theory
  • From: Maarten Bergvelt
• Re: Question about Maple (a color problem)
  • From: anthony
• Re: Maple Vs Mathematica
  • From: Albert Reiner
• Re: Complex variable
  • From: Peter Pein
• Re: Question about Maple (a color problem)
  • From: Alec Mihailovs
• Re: Maple Vs Mathematica
  • From: Nasser Abbasi
• Re: Complex variable
  • From: Caerwyn Esgydiad
• Complex variable
  • From: Elena Rojo
• Galoys Theory
  • From: Jose Antonio
• differential calculus
  • From: javier minguez
• Re: Question about Maple (a color problem)
  • From: anthony
• Re: Maple Vs Mathematica
  • From: John Francis
• Re: Question about Maple (a color problem)
  • From: Robert Israel
• Re: Question about Maple (a color problem)
  • From: anthony
• Question on using GP-Pari to do a Matrix Polar Decomposition
  • From: Randall
• Re: MuPad: question about _if_ statement
  • From: Gary Gaukler
• Re: MuPad: question about _if_ statement
  • From: Gary Gaukler
• Re: Maple Vs Mathematica
  • From: Nasser Abbasi
• Re: Symbolic Math as Computer Science
  • From: daly
• Re: AXIOM available on MacOS-X ?
  • From: daly
• Re: Symbolic Math as Computer Science
  • From: Richard Fateman
• Re: AXIOM available on MacOS-X ?
  • From: Martin Rubey
• Re: Symbolic Math as Computer Science
  • From: Rouben Rostamian
• AXIOM available on MacOS-X ?
  • From: Jean Guillaume Pyraksos
• Symbolic Math as Computer Science
  • From: Hatto von Aquitanien
• Re: Question about Maple (a color problem)
  • From: Alec Mihailovs
• Re: Question about Maple (a color problem)
  • From: anthony
• Re: Question about Maple (a color problem)
  • From: anthony
• Re: Maple Vs Mathematica
  • From: Caerwyn Esgydiad
• Re: Question about Maple (a color problem)
  • From: Alec Mihailovs
• Re: Question about Maple (a color problem)
  • From: anthony
• Re: Maple Vs Mathematica
  • From: Ralf
• Re: Maple Vs Mathematica
  • From: Dave
• Re: Maple Vs Mathematica
  • From: John Carter
• Re: Question about Maple (a color problem)
  • From: Joe Riel
• Question about Maple (a color problem)
  • From: anthony
• Re: Maple Vs Mathematica
  • From: Joe Riel
• Re: Maple Vs Mathematica
  • From: d . swan
• Re: Maple Vs Mathematica
  • From: G. A. Edgar
• Re: Maple Vs Mathematica
  • From: Jean-Claude Arbaut
• Re: Maple Vs Mathematica
  • From: Jean-Claude Arbaut
• Re: Maple Vs Mathematica
  • From: Alasdair McAndrew
• Re: Maple Vs Mathematica
  • From: Caerwyn Esgydiad
• Re: MuPad: question about _if_ statement
  • From: Ralf Hillebrand
• Re: MuPad: question about _if_ statement
  • From: John O'Flaherty
• Re: Maple Vs Mathematica
  • From: Alec Mihailovs
• Re: Maple Vs Mathematica
  • From: Dave
• Re: Maple Vs Mathematica
  • From: Alasdair
• Maple Vs Mathematica
  • From: kush99
• Re: MuPad: question about _if_ statement
  • From: Alasdair
• MuPad: question about _if_ statement
  • From: Gary Gaukler
• Re: differentiate ln(x)
  • From: (-Peter-)

We are proud to have Web Hosting and Rack Housing from 9 Net Avenue Deutschland.
(13)