Re: Maple Vs Mathematica : How much of the source code?
- From: carlos@xxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: 5 Dec 2005 12:39:18 -0800
> The reviewer prefers the Maple GUI and front end, and found
> the lack of a Mathematica debugger annoying.
Lack of a debugger is most annoying to beginner users, but
there are in fact 3 major builtin pieces missing in the kernel:
1) incremental debugger (or even a plain debugger)
2) error tracer
3) real-time breakpointer and "cook-timer"
I wonder: is there a functional language based application that
now includes those 3 components? The old vaxima (Lisp based)
I used during 1982-88 had some rudiments of 1) and 3)
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Maple Vs Mathematica debugging
- From: Richard J. Fateman
- Re: Maple Vs Mathematica : How much of the source code?
- From: Nasser Abbasi
- Re: Maple Vs Mathematica debugging
- References:
- Maple Vs Mathematica
- From: kush99
- Re: Maple Vs Mathematica
- From: Nasser Abbasi
- Re: Maple Vs Mathematica
- From: John Francis
- Re: Maple Vs Mathematica
- From: Nasser Abbasi
- Re: Maple Vs Mathematica
- From: Albert Reiner
- Re: Maple Vs Mathematica : How much of the source code?
- From: Richard Fateman
- Maple Vs Mathematica
- Prev by Date: Re: Question about Maple (a color problem)
- Next by Date: Re: Complex variable
- Previous by thread: Re: Maple Vs Mathematica : How much of the source code?
- Next by thread: Re: Maple Vs Mathematica : How much of the source code?
- Index(es):