Re: Maple Vs Mathematica debugging
- From: parisse@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Tue, 06 Dec 2005 19:31:35 +0100
carlos@xxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
Making schoonschip can be expensive. Take a commercial-product kernel of 2M C++ lines. An average programmer can produce say 500 lines of debugged C++ per year. Cost: 4000 man-years, or roughly $600 million. Need to sell 4 million copies at $1500 each to recover the cost.
Didn't you mean 5000 lines per year? That would divide the programming cost by 10. A commercial project requires much more than just programmers, so maybe 500 millions $ for such a project is a correct estimation. .
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Maple Vs Mathematica debugging / cost to write a system
- From: Richard J. Fateman
- Re: Maple Vs Mathematica debugging / cost to write a system
- References:
- Maple Vs Mathematica
- From: kush99
- Re: Maple Vs Mathematica
- From: Nasser Abbasi
- Re: Maple Vs Mathematica
- From: John Francis
- Re: Maple Vs Mathematica
- From: Nasser Abbasi
- Re: Maple Vs Mathematica
- From: Albert Reiner
- Re: Maple Vs Mathematica : How much of the source code?
- From: Richard Fateman
- Re: Maple Vs Mathematica : How much of the source code?
- From: carlos
- Re: Maple Vs Mathematica debugging
- From: Richard J. Fateman
- Re: Maple Vs Mathematica debugging
- From: carlos
- Re: Maple Vs Mathematica debugging
- From: Jaap Spies
- Re: Maple Vs Mathematica debugging
- From: carlos
- Maple Vs Mathematica
- Prev by Date: Access control on webMathematica
- Next by Date: Re: Maple Vs Mathematica debugging
- Previous by thread: Re: Maple Vs Mathematica debugging
- Next by thread: Re: Maple Vs Mathematica debugging / cost to write a system
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|