Re: Maple Vs Mathematica debugging / cost to write a system

From: carlos@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Date: 7 Dec 2005 22:38:07 -0800

> I am curious why you consider numerical software as easy. This is
> supposed to be the hardest type of software applications to develop
> correctly I would think. NASTRAN, CFD, FEM, stuff like this.

My experience is quite the opposite. Who has told you that?
How much experience have you had writing different types of software?

.

References:
- Maple Vs Mathematica
  - From: kush99
- Re: Maple Vs Mathematica
  - From: Nasser Abbasi
- Re: Maple Vs Mathematica
  - From: John Francis
- Re: Maple Vs Mathematica
  - From: Nasser Abbasi
- Re: Maple Vs Mathematica
  - From: Albert Reiner
- Re: Maple Vs Mathematica : How much of the source code?
  - From: Richard Fateman
- Re: Maple Vs Mathematica : How much of the source code?
  - From: carlos
- Re: Maple Vs Mathematica debugging
  - From: Richard J. Fateman
- Re: Maple Vs Mathematica debugging
  - From: carlos
- Re: Maple Vs Mathematica debugging
  - From: Jaap Spies
- Re: Maple Vs Mathematica debugging
  - From: carlos
- Re: Maple Vs Mathematica debugging
  - From: parisse
- Re: Maple Vs Mathematica debugging / cost to write a system
  - From: Richard J. Fateman
- Re: Maple Vs Mathematica debugging / cost to write a system
  - From: Jaap Spies
- Re: Maple Vs Mathematica debugging / cost to write a system
  - From: carlos
- Re: Maple Vs Mathematica debugging / cost to write a system
  - From: Nasser Abbasi

Prev by Date: Numerical software easy to write?
Next by Date: Re: Maple Vs Mathematica debugging / cost to write a system
Previous by thread: Numerical software easy to write?
Next by thread: Re: Maple Vs Mathematica debugging / cost to write a system
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread