Re: Symbolic Math as Computer Science
- From: Martin Rubey <axiomize@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: 09 Dec 2005 23:21:33 +0100
Hatto von Aquitanien <abbot@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> For one, I don't believe complex numbers would be primitive objects in the
> way they are in Mathematica. Overall, I would probably try to establish a
> better type system. I'm still not sure why Mathematica lacks a real data
> type mechanism. I certainly think of mathematical objects appearing in
> pencil and paper expressions as having specific types. Those are usually the
> first things I define when solving a problem.
You might want to look at Aldor and/or Axiom.
Martin
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Symbolic Math as Computer Science
- From: Nasser Abbasi
- Re: Symbolic Math as Computer Science
- References:
- Symbolic Math as Computer Science
- From: Hatto von Aquitanien
- Re: Symbolic Math as Computer Science
- From: Rouben Rostamian
- Re: Symbolic Math as Computer Science
- From: Richard Fateman
- Re: Symbolic Math as Computer Science
- From: Hatto von Aquitanien
- Re: Symbolic Math as Computer Science
- From: Richard J. Fateman
- Re: Symbolic Math as Computer Science
- From: Hatto von Aquitanien
- Symbolic Math as Computer Science
- Prev by Date: Re: complexity of numerical software
- Next by Date: Re: complexity of numerical software
- Previous by thread: Re: Symbolic Math as Computer Science
- Next by thread: Re: Symbolic Math as Computer Science
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|