Re: complexity of numerical software(2)
- From: Jaap Spies <j.spies@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 09 Dec 2005 22:00:16 +0100
Nasser Abbasi wrote:
"Jaap Spies" <j.spies@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message news:dncml0$eu2$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Richard Fateman wrote:
Jaap Spies wrote:
???I don't know where this enumeration problem came up, but in my view it is not "numerical software" in the sense of "numerical analysis". Combinatory enumeration has its interesting aspects, but to say, based on this example, that numerical software is easy (or hard) doesn't seem convincing. RJf
Do something to proces alle n-subsets of a m-set.
> problem(int n, int m) > { > int i, j;
RJF
May be I stretched the meaning of numerical software a little
to far. At best it is seminumerical, but I did not have an example of well documented code at hand to make my point with true numerical software.
I think the difficulty in numerical/scientific software is not in the coding part itself, it is in having the knowledge to understand the problem itself that you are solving and coding a solution for.
These are a couple of positions at JPL, they require coding in what I would consider scientific software, numerical area.
-------- "Required Skills: Ph. D. in physics or space physics with 1-6 years of experience, Masters
with 3-8 years of experience or Bachelor's with 5-10 years of experience or equivalent.
...
of computer equipment. Demonstrated experience in FORTRAN programming. "
---------
"Required Skills: Ph.D in Analytical Chemistry with 1+ years of experience, or
MA/MS degree with 3+ years experience, ......Experience using MATLAB, PLS tool box, GRAMS"
-----------
I do not think I ever seen a job posting asking for a PhD as a qualification to write a web page or an SQL application or even a device driver.
Nasser
I could not agree more. That is why I underlined the meaning of a good education.
For writing a device driver you maybe need more engineering capabilities?
Jaap .
- References:
- complexity of numerical software(2)
- From: Jaap Spies
- Re: complexity of numerical software(2)
- From: Richard Fateman
- Re: complexity of numerical software(2)
- From: Jaap Spies
- Re: complexity of numerical software(2)
- From: Nasser Abbasi
- complexity of numerical software(2)
- Prev by Date: Re: Symbolic Math as Computer Science
- Next by Date: Re: complexity of numerical software
- Previous by thread: Re: complexity of numerical software(2)
- Next by thread: MathML as a symbolic math language
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|