Re: Reduce equation
- From: "Chip Eastham" <hardmath@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 29 Apr 2006 13:48:22 -0700
Robert Israel wrote:
In article <1146257456.082144.98540@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
<thj2k5@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I was wondering if theres any chance you could help me reduce this
equation:
http://tjakobsen.dk/images/reduce.gif
Reduce it to what? The fonts are pretty small already.
Yes, I have to agree with Dr. Israel. The font is too small
for my tired old eyes!
It looks like you have a factor of 2 and a factor of 1/2 that
offset one another under the radical. The first factor is
clearly 2g, and I suspect the third factor is L/2 (except in
lowercase), but that's one simplification at any rate.
I read one of the terms as m_p and another as perhaps
m_s or m_g. I really can't tell because the subscript is
soooo tiny. But another idea for simplification is to do
the indicated division by the denominator, getting things
in terms of m_s/m_p (or whatever the right subscripts
are), as well as cancelling out some factors of L and
getting a term like d^2/L^2 in one place.
best wishes,
chip
.
- References:
- Reduce equation
- From: thj2k5
- Re: Reduce equation
- From: Robert Israel
- Reduce equation
- Prev by Date: Re: Discrepancy Between 2 Different Ways Of Calculating - What's Wrong, Please?
- Next by Date: Re: Groebner bases over the integers
- Previous by thread: Re: Reduce equation
- Next by thread: Groebner bases over the integers
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|
