Re: Maple's linear algebra routine and higher precision arithmetic
- From: Ronald Haynes <ronald.haynes@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 29 May 2006 15:47:45 -0300
Hi, many thanks... I just want to test the validity of some lower
precision results with results generated by increasing levels of precision.
Would defining the matrix entries as -1.0 4.0 1.0 do the trick to force
floats?
Thanks,
R Haynes
On Mon, 29 May 2006 17:44:19 +0000, Robert Israel wrote:
In article <pan.2006.05.29.15.19.31.155994@xxxxxxxxxx>,
Ronald Haynes <ronald.haynes@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hi, does Maple's linear algebra routine MatrixInverse play nicely with the
Digits command? If I set Digits:=50 and compute a Matrix Inverse will the
arithmetic all be done to 50 digits?
Yes, it will (if the original matrix involves floats). Note that
"to 50 digits" doesn't mean that the results are accurate to 50 digits,
but rather that the calculations are done with Digits set to 50.
Robert Israel israel@xxxxxxxxxxx
Department of Mathematics http://www.math.ubc.ca/~israel
University of British Columbia Vancouver, BC, Canada
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Maple's linear algebra routine and higher precision arithmetic
- From: Ronald Bruck
- Re: Maple's linear algebra routine and higher precision arithmetic
- References:
- Maple's linear algebra routine and higher precision arithmetic
- From: Ronald Haynes
- Re: Maple's linear algebra routine and higher precision arithmetic
- From: Robert Israel
- Maple's linear algebra routine and higher precision arithmetic
- Prev by Date: Re: Maple's linear algebra routine and higher precision arithmetic
- Next by Date: Re: Maple's linear algebra routine and higher precision arithmetic
- Previous by thread: Re: Maple's linear algebra routine and higher precision arithmetic
- Next by thread: Re: Maple's linear algebra routine and higher precision arithmetic
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|