Re: Maple's linear algebra routine and higher precision arithmetic
- From: Ronald Haynes <ronald.haynes@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 31 May 2006 12:21:21 -0300
On Mon, 29 May 2006 13:12:03 -0700, Ronald Bruck wrote:
In article <pan.2006.05.29.18.47.40.640507@xxxxxxxxxx>, Ronald Haynes
<ronald.haynes@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hi, many thanks... I just want to test the validity of some lower
precision results with results generated by increasing levels of precision.
Would defining the matrix entries as -1.0 4.0 1.0 do the trick to force
floats?
In Maple--yes. If you do this in Mathematica you're well-advised to
use a notation like N[-1,64], N[4, 64], N[1,64]. The "4.0" will be
read as a standard double-precision floating-point number.
(Mathematica doesn't have a "Digits" command--each number has its own
intrinsic precision.)
But you asked about Maple, not Mathematica, so this is just for your
general edification...
Hi, upon simple testing this does not seem to work. i.e. setting
Digits:=1 and computing the inverse does not give different results from
setting Digits:=100 and computing the inverse.
Sometime ago I recall hearing that Maple was changing that way it dealt
with linear algebra routines --- maybe by using NAG routines (or similar)
under the hood? If Maple is actually using compiled routines how could
Digits:= whatever actually have an effect, I would presume the routines
would be double precision by default and not be affected by a change of
Digits (except possibly by rounding the input matrix). In my case the
matrix is integer valued. In fact only a slight modification of the
tridiag(-1,4,-1) matrix.
Any further thoughts?
Thanks,
R Haynes
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Maple's linear algebra routine and higher precision arithmetic
- From: Robert Israel
- Re: Maple's linear algebra routine and higher precision arithmetic
- References:
- Maple's linear algebra routine and higher precision arithmetic
- From: Ronald Haynes
- Re: Maple's linear algebra routine and higher precision arithmetic
- From: Robert Israel
- Re: Maple's linear algebra routine and higher precision arithmetic
- From: Ronald Haynes
- Re: Maple's linear algebra routine and higher precision arithmetic
- From: Ronald Bruck
- Maple's linear algebra routine and higher precision arithmetic
- Prev by Date: Slowly MAXIMA in TeXmacs
- Next by Date: Re: Maple's linear algebra routine and higher precision arithmetic
- Previous by thread: Re: Maple's linear algebra routine and higher precision arithmetic
- Next by thread: Re: Maple's linear algebra routine and higher precision arithmetic
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|