sci.math.symbolic

• Date Index

• Re: maxima prob, zeitgeist
• A graph theory terminology challenge, TP2006
  • Re: A graph theory terminology challenge, TP2006
    • Re: A graph theory terminology challenge, TP2006
• A closed form challenge!, TP2006
  • Re: A closed form challenge!, Jean-Marc Gulliet
    • Re: A closed form challenge!, TP2006
      • Re: A closed form challenge!, Paul Abbott
    • Re: A closed form challenge!, sonnenrain17
      • Re: A closed form challenge!, TP2006
      • Re: A closed form challenge!, raymond manzoni
  • Re: A closed form challenge!, Jos Vermaseren
    • Re: A closed form challenge!, Paul Abbott
  • Re: A closed form challenge!, Jean-Marc Gulliet
• avoid numerical overflow in maple, Gunnar G
  • Re: avoid numerical overflow in maple, Axel Vogt
  • Re: avoid numerical overflow in maple, GLaight
• Maxima Mastermind Solver, GLaight
• Re: MACSYMA and AXIOM - the same failure pattern, daly
  • Re: MACSYMA and AXIOM - the same failure pattern, Martin Rubey
    • Message not available
      • Re: MACSYMA and AXIOM - the same failure pattern, Martin Rubey
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: MACSYMA and AXIOM - the same failure pattern, themos
    • Re: MACSYMA and AXIOM - the same failure pattern, Richard J. Fateman
      • Re: MACSYMA and AXIOM - the same failure pattern, Thomas Richard
      • Re: MACSYMA and AXIOM - the same failure pattern, themos
      • Re: MACSYMA and AXIOM - the same failure pattern, rjf
      • Re: MACSYMA and AXIOM - the same failure pattern, daly
• Trig expression, carlos
  • Re: Trig expression, Richard J. Fateman
    • Re: Trig expression, G. A. Edgar
• why VB integration challenges are silly., rjf
  • Re: why VB integration challenges are silly., Vladimir Bondarenko
    • Re: why VB integration challenges are silly., jacob navia
• Re: An exact 1-D integration challenge - 29 - we mean, a challenge for _Maple_, Jeremy Boden
• Definite integral problem, PhysicsNerd
  • Re: Definite integral problem, D Herring
    • Re: Definite integral problem, PhysicsNerd
• Re: An eerie defect in Mathematica Limit, rjf
• Re: An exact 1-D integration challenge - 28 - we mean, a challenge for _Maple_, Nacho
  • Re: An exact 1-D integration challenge - 28 - we mean, a challenge for _Maple_, bernard massé
  • Re: An exact 1-D integration challenge - 28 - we mean, a challenge for _Maple_, Peter Pein
• Re: A Maple bug task for Maple experts and amateurs - 1, Jeremy Boden
• Re: "What might be so fundamentally wrong at Maplesoft?", Jeremy Boden
  • Re: "What might be so fundamentally wrong at Maplesoft?", Herman Rubin
• limit challenge, simple, rjf
  • Re: limit challenge, simple, Christopher Creutzig
  • Re: limit challenge, simple, Robert Israel
• Linbox, simple code to solve Ax = b won't compile?, Susan Margulies
• logic challenge for Mathematica (and others?), rjf
  • Re: logic challenge for Mathematica (and others?), Jean-Marc Gulliet
  • Re: logic challenge for Mathematica (and others?), G. A. Edgar
    • Re: logic challenge for Mathematica (and others?), Jean-Marc Gulliet
      • Re: logic challenge for Mathematica (and others?), rjf
      • Re: logic challenge for Mathematica (and others?), Peter Pein
      • Re: logic challenge for Mathematica (and others?), rjf
    • Re: logic challenge for Mathematica (and others?), Ronald Bruck
• An exact 2-D integration challenge, Simon Tyler
• Re: An exact 1-D integration challenge - 24, Peter Pein
• Need Help, alamshawn
• Re: An exact 1-D integration challenge - 23, G. A. Edgar
• Differential equation for song selection, is it solvable?, johan . walles
  • Re: Differential equation for song selection, is it solvable?, Maarten van Reeuwijk
• Lagrange Multiplier Problem, three variables, JTolman
  • Re: Lagrange Multiplier Problem, three variables, Jean-Marc Gulliet
    • Re: Lagrange Multiplier Problem, three variables, JTolman
      • Re: Lagrange Multiplier Problem, three variables, Peter Pein
      • Re: Lagrange Multiplier Problem, three variables, Dave Rusin
      • Re: Lagrange Multiplier Problem, three variables, Robert Israel
      • Re: Lagrange Multiplier Problem, three variables, Peter Pein
      • Re: Lagrange Multiplier Problem, three variables, Jean-Marc Gulliet
• What wrong in this Mathematica function definition?, janzon
  • Re: What wrong in this Mathematica function definition?, Jean-Marc Gulliet
• Maple 'Collect' equivalent in Mathematica, Prash
  • Re: Maple 'Collect' equivalent in Mathematica, A N Niel
  • Re: Maple 'Collect' equivalent in Mathematica, Jean-Marc Gulliet
    • Re: Maple 'Collect' equivalent in Mathematica, rjf
• Non-Abelian Vector multiplication "pseudo-powers"., Roger Beresford
• i=infinity;0= i*sin k*pi, 1=cos k*pi, k=m/n, n=4,m=0-00; c*G=20=const, 1/sgrt2>G>0.5, 6<N = NA ^2surf/NAvol<7 ; h/N =11=const, e+i*pi; D universe =f(h)*1/ (a))^4, T=f( m, S, D), ivars . fabriciuss
• Maple vs Mathematica, TCL
  • Re: Maple vs Mathematica, Pubkeybreaker
    • Re: Maple vs Mathematica, Ronald Bruck
  • Re: Maple vs Mathematica, Vladimir Bondarenko
  • Re: Maple vs Mathematica, Roman Pearce
    • Re: Maple vs Mathematica, Axel Vogt
  • Re: Maple vs Mathematica, janzon
    • Re: Maple vs Mathematica, Joe Riel
    • Re: Maple vs Mathematica, Nasser Abbasi
      • Re: Maple vs Mathematica, Paul Abbott
• Sqrt discrepancy, Mathematica, Roger Beresford
  • Re: Sqrt discrepancy, Mathematica, Richard J. Fateman
  • Re: Sqrt discrepancy, Mathematica, Jean-Marc Gulliet
    • Re: Sqrt discrepancy, Mathematica, Roger Beresford
      • Re: Sqrt discrepancy, Mathematica, Dana
      • Re: Sqrt discrepancy, Mathematica, Roger Beresford
      • Re: Sqrt discrepancy, Mathematica, Peter Pein
      • Re: Sqrt discrepancy, Mathematica, Dave Rusin
      • Re: Sqrt discrepancy, Mathematica, Roger Beresford
• Symbolic Residues from a trancendental equation, J-F
  • Re: Symbolic Residues from a trancendental equation, Robert Israel
• July articles on scientificcomputing.blogspot.com, Scientific Computing
  • Re: July articles on scientificcomputing.blogspot.com, Juergen Barsuhn
• Solving DAEs using BESIRK, dean . hovard
• linalg[leastsqrs] in Maple V R4, lcw1964
  • Re: linalg[leastsqrs] in Maple V R4, Robert Israel
    • Re: linalg[leastsqrs] in Maple V R4, lcw1964
      • Re: linalg[leastsqrs] in Maple V R4, lcw1964
      • Re: linalg[leastsqrs] in Maple V R4, lcw1964
      • Re: linalg[leastsqrs] in Maple V R4, lcw1964
      • Re: linalg[leastsqrs] in Maple V R4, Robert Israel
      • Re: linalg[leastsqrs] in Maple V R4, lcw1964
      • Re: linalg[leastsqrs] in Maple V R4, lcw1964
      • Re: linalg[leastsqrs] in Maple V R4, Julian V. Noble
      • Re: linalg[leastsqrs] in Maple V R4--success!!!, lcw1964
      • Re: linalg[leastsqrs] in Maple V R4--success!!!, lcw1964
      • Re: linalg[leastsqrs] in Maple V R4, Julian V. Noble
• Disadvantage of Newton Method in Approximate Solution, LaMoRt
  • Re: Disadvantage of Newton Method in Approximate Solution, Julian V. Noble
    • Re: Disadvantage of Newton Method in Approximate Solution, Elias P. TSIGARIDAS
• Re: Calculating the conductor of an elliptic curve using Maple, Robert H. Lewis
• Re: Maplesoft: Vaska the cat syndrome, Craig Carey
  • Re: Maplesoft: Vaska the cat syndrome, Craig Carey
    • Re: Maplesoft: Vaska the cat syndrome, Vladimir Bondarenko
      • Re: Maplesoft: Vaska the cat syndrome, Craig Carey
    • Re: Maplesoft: Vaska the cat syndrome, Christopher Creutzig
      • Re: Maplesoft: Vaska the cat syndrome, Craig Carey
      • Re: Maplesoft: Vaska the cat syndrome, Christopher Creutzig
• Newbie: Maxima output in C style?, Peter Pfannenschmid
  • Re: Newbie: Maxima output in C style?, Herman Rubin
  • Re: Newbie: Maxima output in C style?, Robert Dodier
• Re: Stephen Wolfram, Richard Fateman
  • Re: Stephen Wolfram, Peter Luschny
    • Re: Stephen Wolfram, Valeri Astanoff
• literate AXIOM, Allan Adler
  • Re: literate AXIOM, Rouben Rostamian
  • Re: literate AXIOM, daly
  • Re: literate AXIOM, Bill Page
• Initial Mathcad questions, Zerex71
  • Re: Initial Mathcad questions, MathCalc
• An Interesting Subject 2, theo3
• maximum, d . a . vandera
  • Re: maximum, Valeri Astanoff
    • Re: maximum, Domi
      • Re: maximum, Valeri Astanoff
  • Re: maximum, Robert Israel
  • Re: maximum, Paul Abbott
    • Re: maximum, Robert Israel
• Crosses etc as Plot Labels, Robert C. Helling
  • Re: Crosses etc as Plot Labels, Jean-Marc Gulliet
• Algorithm for denesting nested radicals, xyz91234
  • Re: Algorithm for denesting nested radicals, Vladimir Bondarenko
    • Re: Algorithm for denesting nested radicals, rjf
      • Re: Algorithm for denesting nested radicals, xyz91234
      • Message not available
      • Re: Algorithm for denesting nested radicals, rjf
      • Re: Algorithm for denesting nested radicals, Paul Abbott
• Re: How does Dr. David Kirkby, aka Dave (from the UK), Electronic consultant based in the UK, http://www.drkirkby.co.uk/ understand 'quality' notion?, Dave (from the UK)
• open-source CAS for Pocket PC 2002 / 2003, Dave (from the UK)
  • Re: open-source CAS for Pocket PC 2002 / 2003, Bernard Parisse
    • Re: open-source CAS for Pocket PC 2002 / 2003, Dave (from the UK)
      • Re: open-source CAS for Pocket PC 2002 / 2003, Bernard Parisse
      • Re: open-source CAS for Pocket PC 2002 / 2003, Dave (from the UK)
• Vladimir Bondarenko and Maplesoft, Dave (from the UK)
  • Re: Vladimir Bondarenko and Maplesoft, MathCalc
  • Re: Vladimir Bondarenko and Maplesoft, MathCalc
    • Re: Vladimir Bondarenko and Maplesoft, Vladimir Bondarenko
      • Re: Vladimir Bondarenko and Maplesoft, Dave (from the UK)
      • Re: Vladimir Bondarenko and Maplesoft, Vladimir Bondarenko
      • Re: Vladimir Bondarenko and Maplesoft, Dave (from the UK)
  • Re: Vladimir Bondarenko and Maplesoft, Vladimir Bondarenko
• Re: 1^infinity ?, A N Niel
  • Re: 1^infinity ?, Pubkeybreaker
• Re: maxima again..., rjf
  • Message not available
    • Re: maxima again..., Christopher Creutzig
• Re: MuPAD News, Craig Carey
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: MuPAD News, Richard Kanarek
    • Re: MuPAD News, jsavard
  • Re: MuPAD News, Craig Carey
    • Re: MuPAD News, Vladimir Bondarenko
    • Re: MuPAD News, Christopher Creutzig
      • Re: MuPAD News, Craig Carey
      • Message not available
      • Re: MuPAD News, Craig Carey
      • Re: MuPAD News, Vladimir Bondarenko
      • Re: MuPAD News, Christopher Creutzig
      • Re: MuPAD News, Craig Carey
      • Re: MuPAD News, Christopher Creutzig
      • Re: MuPAD News, Craig Carey
      • Re: MuPAD News, Craig Carey
      • Re: MuPAD News, Christopher Creutzig
• Re: How does a CAS simplify complicated expressions?, Koch-Beuttenmueller
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: How does a CAS simplify complicated expressions?, Vladimir Bondarenko
  • Re: How does a CAS simplify complicated expressions?, Vladimir Bondarenko
    • Re: How does a CAS simplify complicated expressions?, Peter Luschny
• Re: why are the polynomials in this series all solvable by radicals?, Paul Abbott
  • Re: why are the polynomials in this series all solvable by radicals?, Lee Davidson

• Windows
• Science
• Usenet

• Archive
• About
• Privacy
• Search
• Imprint