Re: logic challenge for Mathematica (and others?)
- From: Ronald Bruck <bruck@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2006 09:55:13 -0700
In article <160820060843581690%edgar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, G.
A. Edgar <edgar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
In[1] := 3+Infinity == 4+Infinity
Out[1] = True
In[2] := 3+{} == 4+{}
Out[2] = True
Oh, [2] is VERY elegant! And mathematically correct...
Of course, it's also true that 3 + (-Infinity) == 4 + (-Infinity).
Curiously, if you try this with ComplexInfinity and DirectedInfinity it
doesn't simplify. Can a Mathematica expert explain this?
--
Ron Bruck
Posted Via Usenet.com Premium Usenet Newsgroup Services
----------------------------------------------------------
** SPEED ** RETENTION ** COMPLETION ** ANONYMITY **
----------------------------------------------------------
http://www.usenet.com
.
- References:
- logic challenge for Mathematica (and others?)
- From: rjf
- Re: logic challenge for Mathematica (and others?)
- From: G. A. Edgar
- logic challenge for Mathematica (and others?)
- Prev by Date: Re: logic challenge for Mathematica (and others?)
- Next by Date: Linbox, simple code to solve Ax = b won't compile?
- Previous by thread: Re: logic challenge for Mathematica (and others?)
- Next by thread: Linbox, simple code to solve Ax = b won't compile?
- Index(es):