Re: not a bug in integrate, Mma 6.0. But simplfication/assumptions
- From: rjf <fateman@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 28 Jul 2007 18:07:00 -0000
On Jul 28, 10:01 am, Vladimir Bondarenko <v...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Being fed your example, the VM machine generates simpler ones
1. Thanks to VB's note, I looked at my calculation and should make
this correction to my original post: I evaluated S with a->0, b-
1 ... . Same kind of result. So I was not computing an integral thatexists only in a principal value sense.
2. VB's examples are circumvented in recent mathematica versions, I
think, by doing Integrate[ ...., PrincipalValue->True]. I do not
know if this is the best that can be done, but it is a way of shifting
responsibility for the difficulty in the direction of "user error". A
program that works in all other respects but has problems with
Integrate[{impossible-to-compute-function-of-x},{x,0,0}]
may be quite useful.
.
- References:
- not a bug in integrate, Mma 6.0. But simplfication/assumptions
- From: rjf
- Re: not a bug in integrate, Mma 6.0. But simplfication/assumptions
- From: Vladimir Bondarenko
- not a bug in integrate, Mma 6.0. But simplfication/assumptions
- Prev by Date: Re: A new kind of software development?
- Next by Date: Predicting Student Test Scores
- Previous by thread: Re: not a bug in integrate, Mma 6.0. But simplfication/assumptions
- Next by thread: Predicting Student Test Scores
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|