Pokerization of Lottery
- From: pokerislotto <pokerislotto@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 11 Aug 2007 22:37:42 -0700
******************************************************************
Now we build a Google group called Pokerization of Lottery. You can
easily find it through Google.
Lottery is NOT a game of chance but a game of MANIPULATION. It is
this statement that costs the life of our two websites. We sincerely
invite you to visit our group and look into our Pages carefully. We
didn't form any syndicate nor ask you to pay anything. We just want
you to experience the manipulation yourself
******************************************************************
When we post the above message into the following two forums :
1. SciForum : http://www.sciforums.com/,
2. Physics Forum : http://www.physicsforums.com/index.php,
our message was removed because we are spamming !! We use the
username "lottoispoker" and the password "831diana" for the above two
forums. We are banned forever due to spamming !!
We were very surprised to see that by pointing out "lottery is NOT a
game of chance but a game of MANIPULATION" is actually spamming !!
This could only be happened to those whose mental complexity is lower
than mathematicians or physicists, but how come forums run by
mathematicians or physicists don't find our research very
interesting ?
From Euclidean Geometry to Analytic Geometry to "Seven Bridges of
Koenigsberg" to Topology to Point Set Topology, do you find that
spamming ?
From Geometrical Optics to Duality of Light to Optical Parametric
Chirped Pulse Amplification, do you find that spamming ?
We expect you all can understand the meaning of deductive reasoning
in
mathematical logic, but by building system based upon deductive
reasoning with the intention to replace inductive reasoning totally
is
not possible. Therefore you cannot solve the prediction of lottery
outcomes by probability, measure theory or trend analysis if lottery
is a game of manipulation rather than a game of chance. This is why
Deep Blue of IBM has to test its capability with the help from Garry
Kimovich Kasparov rather than using two Deep Blues to play chess
against one another.
Inductive reasoning MUST not be confused with Fuzzy set. We spent
over 5 years to build the table/graph for those whose mental activity
is complex enough to read it. With our table/graph, almost everyone
can see the manipulative moves of lottery house provided you can read
graph long enough. You can even see the drawing habit of various
lottery houses !! If you have enough ability to make mathematical
abstraction, you may develop some formulae to trace the manipulative
moves of lottery houses.
Do you think we are still spamming ?
.
- Prev by Date: Re: Structured Gaussian elimination?
- Next by Date: implementing rayleighchan in OFDM
- Previous by thread: Structural Gaussian Elimination
- Next by thread: implementing rayleighchan in OFDM
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
