Re: exp(x) + k x = 0; analytic solution
- From: Jean-Marc Gulliet <jeanmarc.gulliet@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 01 Oct 2007 15:51:25 +0200
Per Abrahamsen wrote:
I can easily convince myself that there is exactly one solution when k0, but does it have a nice analytical solution, or do I have to usenumeric methods?
I apologize if this is the wrong place to ask.
The analytic solution returned by Mathematica 6.0.1 for k positive and x real is in terms of *ProductLog* (principal value of the Lambert W-function in Mathematica. See http://mathworld.wolfram.com/LambertW-Function.html)
In[1]:= Reduce[{Exp[x] + k x == 0, k > 0}, x, Reals]
Out[1]= k > 0 && x == -ProductLog[1/k]
Regards,
--
Jean-Marc
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: exp(x) + k x = 0; analytic solution
- From: Robert Israel
- Re: exp(x) + k x = 0; analytic solution
- References:
- exp(x) + k x = 0; analytic solution
- From: Per Abrahamsen
- exp(x) + k x = 0; analytic solution
- Prev by Date: exp(x) + k x = 0; analytic solution
- Next by Date: NUMB3RS, Grobner bases, and "Trust Metrics"
- Previous by thread: exp(x) + k x = 0; analytic solution
- Next by thread: Re: exp(x) + k x = 0; analytic solution
- Index(es):