Re: exp(x) + k x = 0; analytic solution

Thanks to both of you. I guess I can use some existing Lambert W
function implementation, and that will be be better than solving the
original equation numerically.

.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: solve sinus
    ... This is incorrect, try again:) ... After solving for x, check that it satisfies the original equation. ... Mathematically correct, but perhaps the OP's ...
    (comp.graphics.algorithms)
  • Re: Factorizaton idea, revisited
    ... solving for k gives me k = 72/j from the original equation. ... This is obvious from your first sequence, and in this case simplifes ...
    (sci.crypt)
  • Re: Id never seen this before
    ... angle. ... That, solving for the long side, is ... Substituting into my original equation we get: ...
    (rec.aviation.piloting)
  • Re: Second Order Differential Equations
    ... solving a second order differential equation. ... into the original equation to get a first order equation in u. Solve ... that, and then, knowing u, solve y' = u. ...
    (sci.math)