Re: Power Question
- From: David W. Cantrell <DWCantrell@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 07 Jan 2008 00:39:41 GMT
"Dana" <ddelouis@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Does anybody know of a reference to the following question?
What is the proper interpretation of a^b^c ?
I understand that there may not actually be a "proper" interpretation,
There isn't.
and it is left up to each program.
Example:
2^3^4
Excel reads it left-to-right to return 4096.
I'm told Maple 11 says it's ambiguous, and that we should use
Parenthesis.
Although we should always strive to be unambiguous, there's nothing wrong
with a program, like Mathematica, deciding on a specific interpretation of
a^b^c.
Other programs, like Mathematica, read it right-to-left and returns
2.417*^24.
Anyone know of any reference for a "ruling," or is it just a case of
"each program is different."
How could there be such a ruling? Who would make it? (E.g., I suppose a
body such as the DIN could make such a ruling, but would it have much
influence outside of Germany?) Mathematicians, much to my regret, do not
have any standardizing agency.
BTW, one argument for taking a^b^c to mean a^(b^c) is that, if we actually
want (a^b)^c, it can be written easily, via a law of exponents, as a^(b*c).
David
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Power Question
- From: Christopher Creutzig
- Re: Power Question
- From: rjf
- Re: Power Question
- References:
- Power Question
- From: Dana
- Power Question
- Prev by Date: Power Question
- Next by Date: Re: Power Question
- Previous by thread: Power Question
- Next by thread: Re: Power Question
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|